AI Rate Professor

Graphic Arts

Kathleen Pereira

GRART2A · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
42/100
RMP rating
3.3/5
Take again
33.33%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

if you want honest design critique; be cautious and uneven quality.

Best fit · Effort For RewardTough graderIndustry experienceBrutally honest feedbackSlow online gradingCaring in person
  • In-person students praise her industry experience and willingness to help.
  • and questionable AI-written assignment prompts.
  • .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

32/100

and a reported C show an A requires strong work and thick skin under harsh critique.

; online evidence is thin and mixed.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Design projects and fluff.

Online difficulty ratings range from 2 to 4; in-person sat at moderate 3.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

45/100

while others marked it yes, so policy is inconsistent.

Online and .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

35/100

, and online complaints about grading drag the overall recommendation down.

The ; online would-take-again was not provided.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

28/100

Multiple tough-grader tags and incomplete or .

Format shift

and in-person tags.

Workload

Moderate

55/100

Projects and reading matter, but students also note grading by few things rather than endless busywork.

Format shift

Online mentions reading and projects; sample is too small for format split confidence.

Teaching experience

Average

52/100

One glowing industry-mentor review is offset by and AI-written prompts.

Format shift

online reviews.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

28/100

Graphic design projects and peer critiques drive the .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

One strong review calls her one of the and genuine care with blunt critique.

Main concern

Brutal constructive criticism and .

What students said

“ . She has industry experience in the graphic design field & genuinely cares about her students.”
GRART2A

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online students report and suspect AI-written assignment text, with mixed quality scores.

Main concern

Delayed grading and .

What students said

“And it took, her a couple weeks to grade the first project.”
GRART2A
“The professor seems to have used an AI software to write the assignments.”
GRART2A

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews emphasize projects and limited graded items rather than a .

Project-based assessmentFew graded items

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

detail.

Constructive critique
“Be prepared for her brutally honest constructive criticism.”
GRART2A

Online

Online comments focus on project submission and .

Project submissionsSlow grading
“Yes, in the syllabus it does say a psd file, but then again it takes a while to upload and or fails.”
GRART2A

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ . She has industry experience in the graphic design field & genuinely cares about her students.”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 reviews (2 online, 1 in person), highlighting format contrast and . Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

52/100

“She has industry experience in the graphic design field & genuinely cares about her students.”

⚖️

28/100

“Be prepared for her brutally honest constructive criticism.”

🖥️ Online Friction

35/100

“And it took, her a couple weeks to grade the first project.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • genuinely cares about her students
  • brutally honest constructive criticism
  • she'll be more than willing to help you get back on track

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Graded by few things

Theme 3

💻 About Online Experience

  • used an AI software to write the assignments
  • took, her a couple weeks to grade the first project

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

38/100

Evidence confidence

Only three recent reviews with split formats and limited grade detail keep confidence low.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

GRART2A3 reviews

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Incomplete 1 · Not sure yet 1