AI Rate Professor

Ethnic Studies

Alberto Guiterrez

Courses not reported · 17 lifetime ratings

AI rating
18/100
RMP rating
1.7/5
Take again
5.88%
Difficulty
3.7

The decision

Avoid unless you must fulfill the requirement and can .

Best fit · Self Taught ProNo FeedbackEndless ReadingSlow GradingSelf-Teach OnlyConfrontational Tone
  • Students say he barely teaches and dumps repetitive readings and videos weekly.
  • , and picky with little or .
  • Would-take-again is near zero; huge.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

52/100

Several still earn A or B through grind on weekly write-ups, but picky deductions and .

Both formats report high reading grind; online more often notes A grades despite hating the class.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

Massive weekly reading and video load with repetitive papers makes the course feel heavy even when content is not conceptually advanced.

Online and .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

Online often optional with no live class; some in-person and .

Online is usually self-paced posts; .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

8/100

Nearly every review warns against retaking him due , and harsh tone.

Online reviews are almost uniformly negative; .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

22/100

Tough grader who docks small essay mistakes and .

Format shift

Online students especially report opaque deductions and months-late grades.

Workload

Heavy

22/100

Weekly multi-reading write-ups, long videos, and .

Format shift

Both formats emphasize lots of reading and repetitive assignments.

Teaching experience

Awful

16/100

Dominant theme is no real instruction, ignored emails, and confrontational or ego-driven presence.

Format shift

In person has one inspirational outlier; online is overwhelmingly negative.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

22/100

Weekly reading responses, papers, and .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

, and ; one strong positive calls him inspirational if taken live.

Main concern

Confrontational classroom tone and .

What students said

“He has a very large ego and instead of using lecture time for coursework related topics, talks about whatever he wants.”
70472
“you have to take him in person for the full thing. very inspirational and keeps things real.”
71666
“You have .”
30847

Remote format

Online

12 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Asynchronous posts of articles and videos with repetitive weekly write-ups, almost or feedback, and .

Main concern

No teaching or reading responses.

What students said

“He takes FOREVER to grade. He waited .”
70472
“Professor provides and .”
30847
“He never responded to emails. He never communicated with students and never taught.”
71666

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Formal exam policy is thinly described; grade .

Reading Response AssignmentsFew QuizzesPaper HeavyMovie-Based Final

Assessment risk

Standard

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and unclear assignment expectations more than detailed exam security rules.

Heavy ReadingUnclear Assignment Expectations
“Very unclear on what you need to do for .”
30847
“Guiterez assigns an insane number of up with.”
30847

Online

Online reviews mention tedious weekly write-ups, rare quizzes, and .

Weekly Reading Write-UpsMinimal QuizzesNo Lecture Exams Described
“only had 1 quiz, final was only a .”
71666
“Weekly assignments consisted of write 3 main points and 3 explanations to 4-6 readings or videos.”
30847

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ ”

Voice snapshots generated from 17 reviews (12 online, 5 in and reading load. Credibility rating: High.

🚫 Teaching Quality

16/100

“He never communicated with students and never taught. He just posted videos and articles.”

🐢

22/100

“He waited .”

📚 Reading Overload

22/100

“ALOT OF READING. So far from the assignments Ive turned in .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Focuses too much on how student's are doing the work wrong rather than explaining how to do it correctly
  • He talks badly about Stockton, and makes students feel badly about themselves often.
  • seems chill, and from my emails he's accommodating with assignments.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • He was a mistakes he found on essays.
  • Some assignments class average is below 50%.
  • though Im finishing with an A.

Theme 3

📧 About Communication

  • if
  • I made an appointment to meet with him and he literally forgot about it!
  • If days to return the email and he writes back in a confrontational tone.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

17

Recent reviews read by the AI

17

Lifetime ratings

84/100

Evidence confidence

17 recent detailed reviews with , and communication.

Inside 17 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 52
2 out of 53
1 out of 511

Course coverage

308477 reviews
716666 reviews
704722 reviews
502501 review
709611 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

15 reported outcomes

A range

5

A+ 1 · A 3 · A- 1

B range

7

B+ 3 · B 4

C range

1

C+ 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Not sure yet 2