AI Rate Professor

Child Development

Angela Beyer

CHILDDEV · CDEV33 · CDE21 · CDEV32A · ECE21 · CDEV021 · CDEV21 · CDEV · CDEV32B · CHDEV21 · CDEV31A · CDEV31B · CDEV63 · 133 lifetime ratings

AI rating
58/100
RMP rating
3.8/5
Take again
61.33%
Difficulty
2.8

The decision

Prefer her in-person ECE/CDEV sections if you can handle Connect hours; if you need active teaching and light work.

Best fit · Effort For RewardHilarious in-person lecturesHeavy McGraw Hill ConnectTough on discussionsCaring when presentOnline self-teach risk
  • In-person students often love her humor, stories, and care
  • Online sections get slammed for , and harsh tests
  • Workload is high time

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

55/100

Many finish Connect for full credit, but exams and automatic.

In person open notes and care raise odds; online tests and self-teaching make As harder to protect.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Content is introductory child development, but long weekly modules and .

Online reading-and-Connect grind is .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

and penalize absences; others online treat work as asynchronous.

In person attendance often matters; .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

52/100

while .

In-person ECE21 praise is strong; online ECE/CDEV reviews are the main source of .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

48/100

Connect completion can be forgiving, but , and .

Format shift

; in person softens outcomes.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Students repeatedly report multi-hour weekly McGraw Hill modules, papers, and .

Format shift

Online and hybrid both cite 2-5 hour Connect sessions; in person still requires the same platform work.

Teaching experience

Average

58/100

Excellent story-driven lectures in person contrast with and uneven help.

Format shift

In person teaching scores high; online teaching scores low because modules replace live instruction.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

, and multiple timed exams.

Format shift

; in person still mixes lectures with Connect and papers.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

23 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In person she is widely praised as funny, engaging, and and .

Main concern

Still lots of ; a subset of advanced CDEV sections call her cold and harsh.

What students said

“By far the ... Best part of taking this class are her lectures”
ECE21
“Professor Beyer is AMAZING! If !”
ECE21
“The most cold-blooded and unhelpful person I've met which is ironic considering empathy and kindness is the number one priority of child development.”
CDEV32A

Remote format

Online

27 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online feels like self-paced McGraw Hill plus long exams with limited teaching and .

Main concern

, and weak support when stuck.

What students said

“Be prepared to essentially pay for a class/textbook and teach yourself.”
ECE21
“Get ready to work non stop... Book is expensive and required, and goes through McGraw Hill expect to spend at least 4-5 hours on that platform alone”
ECE21
“Exams are 2 hours long and connect assignments are another 2 hours.”
ECE21

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams often feel long and tricky relative to reviews, though some in-person sections allow notes.

Timed examsOpen book or notes in some sectionsTricky true/false and matchingExam-heavy grade impactConnect practice

Assessment risk

Standard

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and if notes and Connect are done; others still find exams frustrating.

Open book/notes in some sectionsExample-based claims contestedPop quiz risk
“ assignments & make notes.”
ECE21
“The work for each chapter that you had to do.”
ECE21

Online

grade, and poorly aligned with reviews for many students.

2-hour examsTest heavyCannot review wrong answers in some terms
“ if you read the book and her lecture materials. You weren't aloud to see what you got wrong on the exams.”
ECE21
“Exams are 2 hours long and connect assignments are another 2 hours.”
ECE21

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Professor Beyer is AMAZING! If ! She truly cares about her students and will give second chances if you need it!”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, emphasizing the . Credibility rating: High.

😂 In-Person Energy

85/100

“no idea why most of the recent reviews on beyer are so negative because she was GENUINELY such an engaging professor.”

💻

25/100

“There is no teaching involved. Be prepared to essentially pay for a class/textbook and teach yourself.”

📚 Workload Drain

28/100

“Get ready to work non stop this is literally one of the most annoying classes... expect to spend at least 4-5 hours on that platform alone just for homework.”

⚖️ Recommendation Split

52/100

“I WISH I could find another class of hers that is open.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She's a funny person and as long as you pay attention you won't have any trouble.
  • She related her personal life to the textbook so that her students can have a better understanding
  • She never really teaches the class.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • their computer for about 3 hours
  • and she still will not give you full points
  • Very easy course! .

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • and really cares about her students.
  • The most cold-blooded and unhelpful person I've met

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

133

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

50 mixed reviews with a and rich workload detail make the pattern reliable.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 577
4 out of 511
3 out of 515
2 out of 512
1 out of 519

Course coverage

ECE2124 reviews
CDEV0214 reviews
CDEV214 reviews
CDEV31B3 reviews
CDE212 reviews
Show 8 more courses
CDEV31A2 reviews
CDEV32A2 reviews
CDEV32B2 reviews
CDEV632 reviews
CHDEV212 reviews
CDEV1 review
CDEV331 review
CHILDDEV1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

43 reported outcomes

A range

18

A+ 2 · A 14 · A- 2

B range

15

B+ 5 · B 10

C range

3

C+ 1 · C 2

D range

3

D+ 2 · D 1

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

3

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Incomplete 1 · Not sure yet 1