AI Rate Professor

English

Chantel Perales

ENG01A · ENG1A · ENG64706 · ENG001 · ENG001A · ENGLISH79 · ENG1D · ENGDAAAA · ENG70 · ENG1B · ENGENG · 001AENGLISH · ENG79 · 45 lifetime ratings

AI rating
34/100
RMP rating
2.7/5
Take again
33.33%
Difficulty
3.2

The decision

Avoid unless you already write strongly and want a .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough graderSo many papersPassive aggressive feedbackHeavy readingEssay-focused
  • as tough, unpredictable, or mood-based with .
  • and .
  • Some students say she can prepare you for college writing, but , and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

32/100

Even students who pass describe , and little room for easy As.

; online also notes rigid unlock order and no late work.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

34/100

feel hard even when tests are rare.

In person and online and reading load.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

28/100

and tags warn that skipping class means you will not pass.

In person shows more mandatory attendance language; .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

30/100

and recent comments urge avoiding her for mental health and .

; recent online and in-person comments are largely negative.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

22/100

; students report no perfect scores, mood-based grades, and .

Format shift

and in person.

Workload

Heavy

26/100

, and sometimes near-daily online tasks create a heavy load.

Format shift

Online workload can feel daily; in person is still paper-heavy.

Teaching experience

Poor

36/100

Many students cite boring lectures, passive-aggressive tone, and weak support despite occasional praise for rigor.

Format shift

; recent tone across formats is poor.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

18/100

Essays and or no traditional tests.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

40 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews span years and are mixed, but recent tone , and demeaning or passive-aggressive delivery.

Main concern

, and weak sense of support for struggling writers.

What students said

“Extremely passive aggressive with responses.”
ENG1A
“She is a tough grader and when you reach out for her .”
ENG001A
“ !”
ENGLISH79

Remote format

Online

6 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

Online English sections feel rigid with , and little flexibility on late work or extensions.

Main concern

Harsh grading, daily assignment load, and stressful.

What students said

“Instead of one or two due dates per week, there were multiple items due almost every day.”
ENG001A
“Gives little feedback on .”
ENG1B
“In .”
ENG1B

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment is mainly long papers rather than proctored exams; friendliness is .

Essay-heavyFew or no testsMastery prep mentioned in older reviewsMinimal quiz focus

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In person is likewise paper-heavy; older comments mention mastery exam prep but .

Long essaysMastery preparationLecture and discussionFew tests
“ .”
ENG001A
“She prepares you extremely well for the !”
ENG79

Online

, and summaries with tough criteria and little test talk.

Long papersDiscussionsSummariesStrict Canvas sequencing
“There weren't any tests but we and ”
ENG1A
“essays, class discussions, and some summaries we had to write from stories we read.”
ENG1B

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Unfortunately, this is the first class I have felt .”

Voice snapshots generated from 46 reviews (6 online, 40 in , and low recommendation. Credibility rating: High.

⚖️

22/100

“ , as if it depended more on her mood than the quality of the work.”

👎 Recommendation Rate

30/100

“ !!!!”

📄 Essay Load

26/100

“ .”

🗣️ Classroom Tone

34/100

“Extremely passive aggressive with responses.”

Theme 1

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • expects perfection
  • did not give anyone a 100 on the first essay

Theme 2

📝 About Workload

  • So many papers
  • multiple items due almost every day
  • Get ready to read
  • excessive and overwhelming workload

Theme 3

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • super boring
  • lacks enthusiasm and PASSION
  • called me out for accidentally doing something wrong in front of the class

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

46

Recent reviews read by the AI

45

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

Forty-six reviews over many years give a large sample; recent and low enjoyment.

Inside 46 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 58
4 out of 53
3 out of 512
2 out of 511
1 out of 512

Course coverage

ENG1A16 reviews
ENG001A6 reviews
ENG1B6 reviews
ENGLISH794 reviews
ENG1D3 reviews
Show 8 more courses
ENG793 reviews
ENG01A2 reviews
001AENGLISH1 review
ENG0011 review
ENG647061 review
ENG701 review
ENGDAAAA1 review
ENGENG1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

18 reported outcomes

A range

6

A 4 · A- 2

B range

5

B+ 2 · B 2 · B- 1

C range

1

C+ 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

5

Audit/No Grade 1 · Drop/Withdrawal 3 · Fail 1