AI Rate Professor

English

Rachel Moraes

ENG1A · ENG001A · ENGLISH1A · ENG1D · ENGLSIH1A · ENGC1000 · ENG1B · 72 lifetime ratings

AI rating
18/100
RMP rating
2.0/5
Take again
15.09%
Difficulty
4.1

The decision

unless you have no other option and .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerHarsh AI DetectionMLA ObsessedHeavy PapersPassive AggressiveZero Empathy
  • Students repeatedly report zeros from AI detectors even when they wrote the work themselves.
  • Workload is essay-heavy with , and .
  • Communication is widely described as rude, passive-aggressive, and unhelpful.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

18/100

Students say an A is basically not possible under AI zeros, MLA nitpicking, and no resubmits.

Online AI penalties dominate; .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

22/100

Constant essays, reading, and perfectionist standards make the course exhausting beyond normal ENG1A.

Both formats report high difficulty; online adds chaotic posting.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

40/100

and mixed online, but the bigger issue is workload not seats.

In-person leans mandatory; online varies.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

15/100

Take-again rate near 15 percent with a flood of .

A few older in-person reviews are positive; .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

12/100

become zeros, and resubmissions are rarely allowed.

Format shift

Online AI detection is the harshest pattern.

Workload

Overwhelming

15/100

, and surprise assignments due almost immediately.

Format shift

Online weekly load is especially crushing.

Teaching experience

Awful

20/100

Students say she does not teach, gives late or , and treats questions rudely.

Format shift

A small older in-person minority called her influential and .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

22/100

, and MLA perfection more than exams.

Format shift

Both formats are paper-centric; some pop quizzes appear.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

18 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews still call her a and heavy essays.

Main concern

Strict perfection standards and passive-aggressive classroom tone.

What students said

“ AI”
ENG1A
“This was my hardest class. Out of all 6 of my classes, this class was the worst.”
ENG001A
“You must be absolutely perfection in this class.”
ENG1A

Remote format

Online

32 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

Online ENG courses are high-volume writing with AI policing, late-posted work, and harsh zeros.

Main concern

AI false flags, random deadlines, and no resubmissions.

What students said

“I got a zero on an essay flagged at 24% AI despite writing it myself.”
ENGC1000
“If you have ANY AI score on a and give a zero.”
ENG1A
“ , and tests are due only an hour or two after they are posted.”
ENG1A

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment centers on harshly graded essays with AI .

Essay HeavyMLA StrictAI DetectionPop QuizzesShort Notice Tests

Assessment risk

Standard

42/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and ; exams are not described as student-friendly.

So Many PapersTough Essay GradingPop Quizzes
“We had about 5 to 6 essays throughout the entire semester and a book to read and discuss.”
ENG1A
“if you get ONLY ONE error, say goodbye to a good grade.”
ENG1A

Online

Online work is essays and short-notice tests or quizzes with aggressive AI detection and .

AI Detection ZerosEssay HeavyShort Notice Assignments
“obsessed with AI detection. I got a zero on an essay flagged at 24% AI despite writing it myself.”
ENGC1000
“ after they are posted.”
ENG001A

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If you have ANY AI score on a and give a zero. I would NEVER recommend her to anyone.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 English reviews with heavy weight on recent AI-related online complaints. Credibility rating: High.

🤖 AI Detection Zeros

12/100

“I got a zero on an essay flagged at 24% AI despite writing it myself.”

📝 MLA Perfectionism

15/100

“Professor Moraes only cares if you follow her syllabus and MLA guidelines.”

😠 Communication Tone

20/100

“She is very passive aggressive toward her students.”

🚫

15/100

“ if you value your time and sanity.”

Theme 1

📈

  • With this woman, an A isn't possible

Theme 2

📝 About Workload

  • So many papers
  • Heavy workload weekly
  • assigns tens of

Theme 3

💬 About Character

  • no empathy for ANYONE
  • passive aggressive
  • Very awful uncaring miserable professor

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

72

Lifetime ratings

90/100

Evidence confidence

Fifty reviews with , and heavy papers, especially recent online posts.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 510
4 out of 55
3 out of 55
2 out of 513
1 out of 539

Course coverage

ENG1A28 reviews
ENG001A12 reviews
ENGC10003 reviews
ENGLISH1A3 reviews
ENG1B2 reviews
Show 2 more courses
ENG1D1 review
ENGLSIH1A1 review

Reported outcomes

C range results lead the reported letter grades.

43 reported outcomes

A range

6

A 2 · A- 4

B range

11

B+ 1 · B 6 · B- 4

C range

12

C+ 4 · C 5 · C- 3

D range

2

D 2

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

11

Not sure yet 6 · Rather not say 5