AI Rate Professor

Engineering

Kamran Sedighi

ENGR01 · ELECT012 · ENGR1 · ELECT11 · ENGR06 · ENGR6 · 15 lifetime ratings

AI rating
52/100
RMP rating
3.6/5
Take again
54.55%
Difficulty
3.3

The decision

Take him only if and ; do not rely on lectures alone.

Best fit · Self Taught ProLecture-HW DisconnectAccessible Outside ClassTest SurprisesNice but UnevenSelf Study Required
  • Students agree he is nice and will help if asked, but lectures often show only easy sample problems.
  • Homework, labs, and .
  • Attendance and lab days matter; lateness and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

48/100

Passing is realistic with full lab and , but .

Almost all evidence is in person; the one .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

36/100

Circuits and engineering topics plus misaligned practice keep the intellectual load above beginner level.

In-person and the single online review both describe conceptual struggle without lecture support.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

30/100

and warn not to be late or .

; the online review listed attendance as not mandatory.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

50/100

Fans call him knowledgeable and chill; because teaching does not prepare for tests.

Recommendation is mixed in person; the only online review is negative on learning outcomes.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

and quizzes can be retaken, but and can cut grades.

Format shift

and understanding; online complaint centers on grade damage from mismatch.

Workload

Moderate

50/100

Labs, homework sets, and pure busywork or zero work.

Format shift

; and exams.

Teaching experience

Average

55/100

Helpful when students initiate questions, but lectures often feel incomplete or disconnected from graded work.

Format shift

In-person quality swings widely by course; .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

62/100

Tests and but exams deciding outcomes.

Format shift

and lab group work; online also stresses exam surprises.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

15 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

unprepared lecturer with phone-in-lab complaints.

Main concern

and lab timing make the class high variance.

What students said

“During the lecture, he will do the easiest problem to finish his duty”
ENGR06
“He was often and never helped if you messed up”
ELECT012
“Sedighi will answer your questions and ”
ELECT11

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The single online review reports the and a painful grade outcome.

Main concern

Recorded lectures use easy demos that do not prepare students for and exams.

What students said

“ and . During the recorded lecture he does the easiest problem possible”
ENGR06

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

, so success depends on independent practice beyond class examples.

Test heavyExam surprisesLab-based pointsQuiz retakes sometimes

Assessment risk

Standard

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person students report midterms and finals with surprises and .

Midterms and finalLab deadlinesPossible quiz retakes
“midterms and ”
ENGR06
“ ”
ENGR01
“Great Professor, !”
ENGR06

Online

The sole online review says recorded lectures use easy problems while .

Recorded lecturesExam surprisesSelf teaching required
“If you manage to self taught then he will surprise with different questions in the exam”
ENGR06

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“During the lecture, he will do the easiest problem to finish his duty. When it comes to the HW his lecture barely help to solve the HW problems.”

Voice snapshots generated from 16 reviews with and labs. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

55/100

“Prof Sedighi is a . And his HW and ”

📚 Self Teaching Need

36/100

“ and ”

👍 Recommendation Split

50/100

“ ! Don't be a Lazy a** and you will pretty much pass his course(s).”

🧪 Lab Reality

40/100

“He was often and never helped if you messed up”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • really good at answer questions and helping you solve problems
  • not ready to lecture this material
  • teaches material pretty well

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • !
  • the class is easy to pass
  • my 3.71 GPA destroyed

Theme 3

⏱️ and Labs

  • do NOT be late for class, he hates that
  • miss the few days and you're screwed
  • dont be late

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

16

Recent reviews read by the AI

15

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

Sixteen reviews with only one online leave a usable but thinner sample, and opinions are more split than tightly consistent.

Inside 16 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 58
4 out of 51
3 out of 53
2 out of 51
1 out of 53

Course coverage

ELECT0124 reviews
ENGR014 reviews
ENGR064 reviews
ENGR62 reviews
ELECT111 review
Show 1 more courses
ENGR11 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

12 reported outcomes

A range

4

A 3 · A- 1

B range

5

B+ 1 · B 3 · B- 1

C range

1

C- 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Not sure yet 2