AI Rate Professor

English

Angalee Vana

ENG01A · ENG1A · ENGL1A · ENG1 · EN1A · ENG001 · ENG001A · ENG52 · ENGLI1A · 54 lifetime ratings

AI rating
34/100
RMP rating
2.2/5
Take again
30.77%
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

Avoid unless you already write at a high level and .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough GraderLots of PapersUnclear InstructionsHeavy ReadingSlow Feedback
  • and length
  • Heavy load of papers, reading, and busywork that burns students out fast
  • Instructions often contradict each other and

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

38/100

A few students say full effort yields an A, but , and harsh format deductions.

Online reviews stress contradictory rules and AI suspicion; with heavy papers.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

32/100

Content is college English with , and frequent papers rather than light intro work.

Both formats report lots of reading and multi-page essays; .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

42/100

as mandatory and skip-class warnings, while some .

as required; online is mixed and sometimes optional.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

30/100

Would-take-again is low and , and .

Online is especially negative; a minority of in-person students praise personality and if you work hard.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

28/100

; essays are docked heavily for format, length, and style.

Format shift

Online students report half credit for minor issues; but sometimes fair if effort is high.

Workload

Heavy

22/100

Constant papers, reading, and and burn out procrastinators.

Format shift

Both formats flag lots of homework and so many papers.

Teaching experience

Poor

40/100

Some like her stories and care, but , and teaching unhelpful.

Format shift

In-person has more praise for personality; online and contradictory prompts.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

22/100

Grades hinge on frequent essays and .

Format shift

Same essay-heavy pattern online and in person.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

42 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In person she can be personable and story-driven, but still a and papers; .

Main concern

Volume of essays and format issues.

What students said

“There are tons of works, so be prepared. She is a ”
ENGL1A
“ABSOLUTE WORSE PROFESSOR I'VE EVER HAD, JUST HORRIBLE.. LAZY INCONSIDERATE”
ENG001

Remote format

Online

8 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

Online students report harsh grading, contradictory instructions, AI accusations, and .

Main concern

and strict docking of .

What students said

“Her instructions also contradict each other. Save yourself, the time, and your money.”
ENG001
“ , and docks 20+ pts on an ”
ENG1A

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment centers on multi-page essays and .

Long EssaysTake-Home PapersMidterm and Final on NovelFormat-Strict Grading

Assessment risk

Standard

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person comments mention long essays, novel-based tests, and occasionally a .

6-8 page essaysNovel-based midterm and finalTake-home essays
“YOU HAVE TO WRITE THREE LONG ESSAYS THAT ARE 6-8 PAGES LONG”
ENG001A
“we wrote 3 take home essays (1500-2000wrds) and one in ”
ENG1A

Online

, and unclear instructions rather than proctor software.

Essays every two weeksStrict format dockingSlow or missing feedback
“ . She often questioned whether students used AI”
ENG001
“The average score on each paper was a 60.”
ENG1A

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Save yourself, the time, and your money.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting grading, workload, and support themes. Credibility rating: High.

📝

28/100

“I'm receiving half credit for minimal reasons. Her instructions also contradict each other.”

📚

22/100

“There are tons of works, so be prepared. She is a ”

👎 Low Recommendation

30/100

“ IF .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • she always shares her experiences and comes up with so many examples
  • Extremely rude and judgemental for no reason
  • She gives extremely vague instructions

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • as long as you do all the work assigned, you will get an easy A
  • docks 20+ pts on an
  • only gives C's or

Theme 3

⚠️ About Workload

  • this class can EASILY make you burnt out in the first month
  • LOTS OF READING

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

54

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

Fifty detailed reviews spanning many years with and heavy papers.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 55
4 out of 56
3 out of 59
2 out of 513
1 out of 522

Course coverage

ENG1A26 reviews
ENG001A8 reviews
EN1A5 reviews
ENG0015 reviews
ENGL1A2 reviews
Show 4 more courses
ENG01A1 review
ENG11 review
ENG521 review
ENGLI1A1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

22 reported outcomes

A range

7

A 5 · A- 2

B range

7

B+ 3 · B 2 · B- 2

C range

1

C+ 1

D range

1

D 1

F

2

F 2

No letter grade reported

4

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Not_Sure_Yet 1 · Rather not say 2