AI Rate Professor

Humanities

Chloe Brotherton

HUM4 · 20 lifetime ratings

AI rating
33/100
RMP rating
2.2/5
Take again
23.81%
Difficulty
3.3

The decision

unless you need this exact linguistics intro and .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerLate GradingLecture HeavyUnresponsive EmailsDense FinalsGroup Language Project
  • Grading and email replies are chronically late, leaving students in the dark
  • Finals and course
  • A minority praise passion and free materials, but most advise switching professors

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

55/100

Several A and A+ grades appear, but tough quizzes, dense finals, and .

Online reports multi-hour essay finals; homework for some.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

34/100

Material feels advanced for an intro linguistics class with long dense lectures and heavy conceptual load.

Both formats call content dense; online lectures are especially long and slide-heavy.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

48/100

and no in others, with participation mattering when required.

In-person participation and group work matter more; .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

28/100

Low take-again rate and , and finals outweigh sparse praise.

Online is broadly negative; a .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

48/100

Some students earn high marks, but tough grader tags and .

Format shift

the end.

Workload

Moderate

55/100

Weekly load can be light discussions, but finals and .

Format shift

Online weekly work is lighter until the final; in-person adds group language work.

Teaching experience

Poor

38/100

A few praise passion and ; most , and slide-reading lectures.

Format shift

; online focuses on unresponsiveness.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

68/100

Quizzes and a routine homework.

Format shift

Online is test and ; place of a classic exam.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

6 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

some love her passion and and .

Main concern

and group project friction for intro-level students.

What students said

“ . Such a great professor because she is so passionate”
HUM4
“Dismissed questions rudely and abruptly without giving good insight.”
HUM4

Remote format

Online

15 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online is lecture-heavy, slow , and stressful around a .

Main concern

Late modules, late grades, and a .

What students said

“She waited until the last two weeks to grade any of our assignments”
HUM4
“It took me five HOURS! This was supposed to be an intro-class, not grad school.”
HUM4

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Finals are described as multi-hour thorough essay responses; some online allow unlimited time and multiple attempts.

Dense Essay FinalMultiple Attempts OnlineGroup Conlang ProjectLong Lecture Quizzes

Assessment risk

Strict

34/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

project to invent a language instead of a .

Hard testsGroup language projectLecture-based quizzes
“The only thing that was really hard was the tests and especially the final.”
HUM4
“She assigns a exam which I appreciated and loved.”
HUM4

Online

Online students describe a and delayed grading of checkpoints.

Multi-hour essay finalMultiple attempts no time limitLate checkpoint grading
“Final exam was difficult with .”
HUM4
“The final was made up of 20 questions... each of the questions required a ”
HUM4

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“It took me five HOURS! This was supposed to be an intro-class, not grad school.”

Voice snapshots generated from 21 , and organization. Credibility rating: Medium.

⏳

25/100

“She waited until the last two weeks to grade any of our assignments”

📚

34/100

“each of the questions required a "thorough" explanation with 5+ stipulations. It took me five HOURS!”

👎 Recommendation Level

28/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Lectures were not engaging nor
  • She clearly demonstrates a passion for her subject

Theme 2

📧 About Communication

  • expect a response several weeks later that is if
  • responses are short and a bit rude

Theme 3

📈 About Difficulty and Finals

  • the and stressful for a junior-college level introduction course
  • multiple attempts were allowed w/ no time limit
  • constructing a language

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

21

Recent reviews read by the AI

20

Lifetime ratings

72/100

Evidence confidence

Twenty-one mostly recent reviews are detailed and .

Inside 21 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 50
3 out of 53
2 out of 57
1 out of 58

Course coverage

HUM421 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

18 reported outcomes

A range

7

A+ 4 · A 2 · A- 1

B range

1

B- 1

C range

3

C+ 2 · C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

7

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Not sure yet 5 · Rather not say 1