AI Rate Professor

Sociology

Marcus Green

INTRO23 · SOCIO33 · SOCIO1B · SOCIO001B · SOCIO1A · SOCIO001A · 37 lifetime ratings

AI rating
34/100
RMP rating
3.0/5
Take again
34.48%
Difficulty
2.6

The decision

if and videos and can tolerate messy Canvas and limited instructor contact.

Best fit · Self Taught ProDisorganized CanvasSelf Taught CoursePoor CommunicationTough GraderEssay and Reading Heavy
  • Many recent students say the and YouTube videos.
  • Canvas organization, delayed email replies, and .
  • , but overall recommendation rate is low.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

55/100

Completing readings and assignments can yield an A, but , and big finals can undercut it.

Online students more often call it an ; .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

68/100

Content is mostly textbook and video driven rather than conceptually brutal, though volume of .

Online sections feel easy but boring; and more test heavy.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

, while many online sections do not require live presence.

Online is often flexible; .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

34/100

because many students dislike the disorganization, communication, and lack of real teaching.

Recent online reviews are especially negative; .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

32/100

, and gradebook surprises appear often across courses.

Format shift

Both formats complain about harsh or .

Workload

Heavy

38/100

Expect , and for some courses essays every couple of weeks.

Format shift

Online SOCIO33 is paper heavy; many online 1A sections are video and reading heavy.

Teaching experience

Poor

38/100

Students frequently say they teach themselves from Crash Course videos and the book with little instructor interaction.

Format shift

In-person lectures get mixed marks; online instruction presence is consistently criticized.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Assessment mixes textbook homework, discussions or papers, quizzes or tests, and sometimes a .

Format shift

Online leans papers and homework; .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

18 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

some call him fun and chill if you read, others say lectures add little and tests dominate.

Main concern

and weak lecture value compared with the textbook.

What students said

“ , if .”
SOCIO001A
“You will learn more from the book than you will in class.”
SOCIO001A
“Your grade . I got a C! .”
SOCIO1A

Remote format

Online

19 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online sections are often called unorganized paycheck classes with , and little teaching presence.

Main concern

Poor communication, scavenger-hunt Canvas links, strict or awkward deadlines, and .

What students said

“This professor just wants a paycheck. The professor would not interact with students and would just give like 5 videos a week to teach students.”
SOCIO001A
“This class really could have been self taught. Virtually no communication from him.”
SOCIO001A
“Professor Green was not the . I've emailed him three months prior... and he responded near the finals.”
SOCIO33

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Tests often come from textbook hypotheticals or study guides, and .

Textbook Hypothetical TestsMultiple Choice and TFHigh Stakes FinalStudy Guides

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and a final based on chapter reading and study guides.

Multiple Choice and TFWeekly TestsStudy GuidesTest Heavy
“5 tests, multiple choice and TF. Lectures go fast so make sure you read!”
SOCIO001A
“You HAVE to read, or at least go over the chapters in depth to get what is on the tests.”
SOCIO001A

Online

Online quizzes and tests are often based on textbook hypotheticals rather than lecture, with .

Textbook HypotheticalsQuizzes and TestsFinal Exam
“Quizzes, Tests and , but rather the hypotheticals in the textbook.”
SOCIO001A
“It's very easy until the grade.”
SOCIO1A

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“This class really could have been self taught. Virtually no communication from him. No video lectures, just copious amounts of YouTube videos”

Voice snapshots generated from 37 reviews, highlighting self-teaching, organization, and . Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Presence

38/100

“Lazy, lazy, lazy teaching. This class was literally just crash course videos and answering textbook questions.”

📉 Recommendation Rate

34/100

“Wish I reviewed him sooner. and not easy to like.”

🗂️ Organization Issues

30/100

“ . You .”

📝 Workload Pattern

38/100

“ . You will be expected to write an .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • You basically teach yourself
  • His lectures and group activities are all from the book
  • Really cool and chill teacher

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • If you want an easy A , but don't expect to learn much
  • Tough grades for absolutely no reason
  • grades are extremely misleading, and it is not the grade you will receive

Theme 3

📬 About Communication and Canvas

  • don't bother emailing him he doesn't answer
  • Online page to his class can be difficult to navigate
  • Difficult to communicate with, major attitude

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

37

Recent reviews read by the AI

37

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

37 reviews with a large online sample show consistent modern complaints about organization and communication despite some older praise.

Inside 37 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 511
4 out of 51
3 out of 59
2 out of 58
1 out of 58

Course coverage

SOCIO1A16 reviews
SOCIO001A10 reviews
SOCIO335 reviews
SOCIO1B4 reviews
INTRO231 review
Show 1 more courses
SOCIO001B1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

30 reported outcomes

A range

14

A 8 · A- 6

B range

10

B+ 4 · B 6

C range

2

C+ 1 · C 1

D range

1

D 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

3

Incomplete 1 · Not sure yet 2