AI Rate Professor

Art History

Meredith Lange

ART1A · ART002 · ART001C · ART2 · ART1C · ART001A · 29 lifetime ratings

AI rating
36/100
RMP rating
3.7/5
Take again
20%
Difficulty
2.9

The decision

; only take if you enjoy dense art lectures and .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerLecture heavyTough graderLots of homeworkBoring lecturesPop quizzes
  • older reviews warm, recent reviews call lectures long and dull.
  • , and slide ID tests drive the workload.
  • email responses.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

34/100

and dense exams mean even strong students often land B or lower without heavy study.

Online A grades appear when students power through videos; .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

35/100

Content is memorization-heavy art history with long lectures, readings, and multi-part tests.

Online focuses on long video packs; and dry lectures.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

28/100

Pop quizzes and not formally required.

; many online sections list attendance as no but .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

28/100

and repeated boredom or bias complaints outweigh kinder older reviews.

Recent online and .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

30/100

Essays and ; tough grader tags are frequent.

Format shift

; online is slightly softer but still picky.

Workload

Heavy

26/100

, and museum or multi-part finals stack up.

Format shift

Online video hours and discussions are heavy; and papers.

Teaching experience

Average

48/100

Some call her kind and passionate; many say she reads slides and lectures are boring.

Format shift

Older in-person reviews are warmer; recent online reviews are sharply negative.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

68/100

Weekly tests or quizzes, midterms, finals, and .

Format shift

Online uses weekly 10-pt tests plus projects; , and essays.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

21 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person sections are lecture-and-PowerPoint heavy with , and dry delivery for many.

Main concern

and .

What students said

“her lectures or too long and super boring, learned nothing at all.”
ART1A
“She gives the class like 1-3 pop quizzes a week so .”
ART001A
“4 essays, 2 midterms, final exam, and pop quizzes every class.”
ART2

Remote format

Online

8 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

Online art history piles , and multi-part finals.

Main concern

Long boring lecture packs and .

What students said

“ and kept using bitmojis of herself for every announcement and module.”
ART2
“Lectures are BORING, ranging from around 3-24 minutes long and each unit has 6 or 10 videos each.”
ART2
“there were a collection of lecture videos each week, which together when taking notes is about two hours every week and then a quiz.”
ART2

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Standard to strict art history testing with memorization, quizzes, and critical essays.

Weekly quizzesSlide identificationEssaysPop quizzesMidterms and final

Assessment risk

Standard

42/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and strict essay grading.

Pop quizzesTough examsEssay heavy
“She gives the class like 1-3 pop quizzes a week so because of that.”
ART001A
“She is a and so study study!!”
ART2

Online

Online , and multi-part final projects; proctoring is not clearly described.

Weekly quizzesLecture video testsMulti-part final project
“There is a 10 pt. ; just pay attention and .”
ART001C
“Weekly quizzes, three big tests, and .”
ART2

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“I really absolutely would never and . This class is the worst and the most boring class you could ever take.”

Voice snapshots generated from 29 reviews (8 online, 21 in person), highlighting lecture boredom, heavy testing, and low recommendation. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

48/100

“Not a good teacher, her lectures or too long and super boring, learned nothing at all.”

👎 Recommendation Rate

28/100

“ . She's okay, I learned nothing, and her lectures are long and uninteresting.”

📚 Workload & Reading

26/100

“the course was very heavy since there were a collection of lecture videos each week... about two hours every week and then a quiz.”

⚖️

30/100

“She is also strict about grading and .”

Theme 1

😴 About Lectures

  • her lectures or too long and super boring
  • Lectures are BORING
  • she just reads off the PowerPoints

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • I failed and I never fail classes.
  • I am a straight A student but ended up with a B- in this class.
  • Easy A if you put some effort.

Theme 3

📝 About Assignments

  • 4 essays, 2 midterms, final exam, and pop quizzes every class.
  • Get ready for your mentality to break with this course
  • DON'T wait til the last minute to start the discussions

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

29

Recent reviews read by the AI

29

Lifetime ratings

72/100

Evidence confidence

29 reviews with a long time span but polarized tone and a .

Inside 29 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 514
4 out of 56
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 57

Course coverage

ART1C8 reviews
ART27 reviews
ART001A5 reviews
ART1A4 reviews
ART001C3 reviews
Show 1 more courses
ART0022 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

16 reported outcomes

A range

6

A+ 2 · A 3 · A- 1

B range

6

B+ 1 · B 3 · B- 2

C range

2

C+ 1 · C- 1

D range

1

D 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1