AI Rate Professor

Business

Andrew Kobylanski

BUS21 · BUS94A · BUS023 · BUS029 · BUS20 · 12 lifetime ratings

AI rating
76/100
RMP rating
3.9/5
Take again
66.67%
Difficulty
1.8

The decision

if you can work independently and .

Best fit · Easy A HunterEasy ContentSlow EmailsClear CriteriaFlexible Online WorkInformative Lectures
  • Coursework is generally easy and many students earn As and assignments.
  • Communication is the and multi-week email delays for some.
  • and mandatory while online is flexible but uneven in support.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

82/100

Most reported grades are A or A+ and students say do the work and you pass without hard content.

Online emphasizes easy weekly chapters; .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

78/100

Difficulty averages low; content is standard business material with flexible discussions.

Both formats describe light intellectual challenge overall.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

52/100

Some online sections need little attendance while several in-person and .

; online is more mixed.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

68/100

About two-thirds would take again, tempered by repeated communication complaints.

In-person recent praise is strong; online mixes love with .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

74/100

Allows makeups for some and and straightforward work rather than traps.

Format shift

One online review called him a , but most report fair easy grades.

Workload

Light

78/100

Light weekly chapters, discussions, and .

Format shift

Online is especially light; one negative review claimed lots of homework.

Teaching experience

Good

72/100

Many call lectures informative and passionate, undercut by slow communication and uneven lecture style for others.

Format shift

; online praise is mixed with ghosting complaints.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

38/100

Discussions, presentations, and for most students.

Format shift

In-person mentions presentations; online centers on discussions and chapter work.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person fans praise informative fire lectures and care, while and weak lecture style.

Main concern

Attendance and participation can be strictly enforced near the end of term.

What students said

“His lectures were fire and he's not bad looking at all.”
BUS029
“Will automatically deduct 10% of your grade if you miss any of the last few weeks of class.”
BUS20
“Professor Kobylanski is a respectable professor who classes are very informative.”
BUS21

Remote format

Online

8 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

Online work is light and flexible with discussions and videos, but several students slam slow emails and .

Main concern

Poor communication can leave you unsure of progress for weeks.

What students said

“Usually 1-2 chapters a , and 1-2 additional videos. Easy class.”
BUS20
“HOWEVER, communication is HORRIBLE. Takes 2 weeks or more to return an email.”
BUS21
“He so you never know how well you are doing.”
BUS21

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment leans on discussions and assignments; reviews .

DiscussionsPresentationsClear CriteriaTest Heavy Mentioned Once

Assessment risk

Standard

62/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person work includes presentations and grade late in the semester.

PresentationsAttendance-Linked GradeTest Heavy Tag
“We mostly had to do presentations. .”
BUS023
“Will automatically deduct 10% of your grade if you miss any of the last few weeks of class.”
BUS20

Online

Online assessment centers on discussions, lecture videos, and .

Weekly DiscussionsLecture VideosClear Grading Criteria
“Usually 1-2 chapters a , and 1-2 additional videos. Easy class.”
BUS20
“As long as you do your work, he will see you did it and count it as participation with discussions”
BUS023

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“His lectures were fire and he's not bad looking at all.”

Voice snapshots generated from 12 reviews, balancing easy grades against communication friction. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Easy Coursework

82/100

“Easy class.”

📧 Communication Issues

40/100

“Takes 2 weeks or more to return an email.”

👍

68/100

“My learning experience with him has .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • His lectures were fire
  • classes are very informative
  • his lecture style is absolutely terrible

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • Easy class
  • Work is not difficult
  • You show up to class everyday on time and do your work. Then you will pass.

Theme 3

📬 About Communication

  • Takes 2 weeks or more to return an email
  • He
  • Absolutely never checks or answers emails

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

12

Recent reviews read by the AI

12

Lifetime ratings

68/100

Evidence confidence

12 reviews with mixed but detailed views across online and in-person from 2018 to 2025; sample is modest.

Inside 12 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 56
4 out of 52
3 out of 52
2 out of 51
1 out of 51

Course coverage

BUS214 reviews
BUS0232 reviews
BUS0292 reviews
BUS202 reviews
BUS94A2 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

12 reported outcomes

A range

9

A+ 4 · A 4 · A- 1

B range

3

B+ 1 · B 2

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values