Is this an easy A?
FairEffort
58/100Many report As, but tough-grader tags, high difficulty ratings, and .
All evidence is from In person reviews.
The decision
Key questions
Is this an easy A?
Many report As, but tough-grader tags, high difficulty ratings, and x x x x x x x x x.
All evidence is from In person reviews.
Is the course easy?
Scenic/tech work is time-heavy and job-like; several call it a nightmare or too much for the units.
All evidence is from In person reviews.
Is attendance flexible?
x x x x and x x.
All evidence is from In person reviews.
Is this professor recommended?
More students scream avoid than praise, despite a few loyal fans of technical theatre.
All evidence is from In person reviews.
Course guide
Grading
Fair
48/100
Grades often high if you show up and work, but tough-grader and x x x x.
Format shift
All evidence is from In person reviews.
Workload
Heavy
28/100
Labs, builds, and show work demand lots of time beyond lecture.
Format shift
All evidence is from In person reviews.
Teaching experience
Poor
35/100
skilled tech mentor for some, aggressive and unprofessional for many others.
Format shift
All evidence is from In person reviews.
Assessment method
FocusOnAssignments
30/100
Projects, lab builds, and participation dominate over traditional exams.
Format shift
All evidence is from In person reviews.
Luni fit check
Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.
Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.
Course format
Classroom format
Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner
In-person drama tech labs mix real build experience with reports of x x x x x x, and ethical concerns.
Main concern
Aggressive tone, credit-stealing accusations, and workload that feels like unpaid crew work.
What students said
“x x x x!!! THIS MAN IS AGGRESSIVE TOWARD STUDENTS AND NEEDS A REALITY CHECK.”
“He's a fraud, and he uses unethical practices.”
“you get a ton of building experience. Downside is that it feels like unpaid labor if you dont enjoy it.”
Remote format
Low confidence
No stored summary is available for this format.
Main concern
No main concern is stored for this format.
Exam style
Reviews focus on builds, labs, and x x x x x x.
Assessment risk
Standard
55/100
Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.
In person scenic and design work is graded via projects, lab hours, and participation; x x x x x x x.
“the x x x and taught us different t was to use color and painting styles”
“Drama 19B, the design class, was a lot more work than I had anticipated.”
Student evidence
Top student voice
“x x x x!!! THIS MAN IS AGGRESSIVE TOWARD STUDENTS AND NEEDS A REALITY CHECK.”
“x x x x, and spends most of class time talking about his personal life stories.”
“I can honestly say that I have learned a lot. He is very well educated in technical theatre.”
“he steals the credit of his students and peers' work.”
“AVOID!!! I'll be avoiding his classes like an unstable atom bomb”
Theme 1
Theme 2
Theme 3
Data context
Analysis sample
10
Recent reviews read by the AI
10
Lifetime ratings
68/100
Evidence confidence
Ten in-person reviews span 2012-2025 with mixed extremes; detail is rich but opinions conflict.
Inside 10 stored ratings
Reported outcomes
8 reported outcomes
A+ 1 · A 5
B- 1
No reported values
No reported values
No reported values
Not sure yet 1