AI Rate Professor

Nursing

Rachael De Anda

ADN1 · ADN5 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
93/100
RMP rating
4.7/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
1.7

The decision

Take her for clinical or skills if you want a the floor.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyCaring clinical mentorPatient skills coachStudent advocateOptimistic and approachable
  • Universally praised as caring, patient, and
  • Low difficulty with strong support and critical-thinking push
  • but students still want more time with her

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

82/100

Students report low difficulty and strong support with grades of A or B, so an A is realistic without extreme grind.

and skills courses.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

78/100

Difficulty ratings are low and comments emphasize comfort, patience, and guidance rather than conceptual overload.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

20/100

and skills.

.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

96/100

and describe her as , and a strong student advocate.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

78/100

No tough-grader complaints; and .

Format shift

.

Workload

Light

72/100

Comments focus on supportive clinical .

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Excellent

94/100

Students call her the , and genuine care.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

30/100

Reviews center on skills, clinical performance, feedback, and care .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person clinical and skills reviews describe a and builds confidence.

Main concern

Clinical days with her are limited and .

What students said

“Prof. De Anda is the best! She's optimistic, well-respected among her colleagues, answers all questions, and pushes students to think critically.”
ADN5
“Super sweet and approachable. I had her for skills during ADN1 and she was amazing.”
ADN1
“ . She truly loves her job and it shows.”
ADN5

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not .

Assessment risk

Varies

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

or proctoring policies.

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Prof. De Anda is the best! She's optimistic, well-respected among her colleagues, answers all questions, and pushes students to think critically.”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 in-person nursing reviews, highlighting clinical support and caring teaching. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

94/100

“Super sweet and approachable. I had her for skills during ADN1 and she was amazing. Made us all feel comfortable and .”

❤️ Student Advocacy

96/100

“Amazing advocate for her students, colleagues, and patients. I wish I had more time with her!”

👍 Recommendation Rate

96/100

“You will learn a lot from her.”

Theme 1

👨‍⚕️ About Clinical Presence

  • she is visible on the floor and goes in the room with you
  • I wish we had more

Theme 2

❤️ About Character

  • Super sweet and approachable
  • Very nice and humble
  • She truly loves her job and it shows

Theme 3

📈 About Learning

  • pushes students to think critically
  • You will learn a lot from her
  • Made us all feel comfortable and

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

Only three detailed in-person reviews spanning 2022-2025, highly consistent and specific but a small sample.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ADN52 reviews
ADN11 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1