AI Rate Professor

Child Development

Suzanne Coleman

ECE26 · CDEV034 · CDEV27 · CDEV072 · CDEV32A · CDEV31B · CDEV054 · CHDEV3488 · CDEV21 · CDEV031B · CDEV026 · CDEV31A · CDEV31 · CDEV34 · CDEV021 · 35 lifetime ratings

AI rating
58/100
RMP rating
3.5/5
Take again
53.85%
Difficulty
2.3

The decision

if you want a caring, easy child-development class and can handle disorganization and .

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyDisorganizedCaringEasy A When EngagedSlow GradingUnresponsive Emails
  • Course content and if you care about child development and participate.
  • Biggest , and poor email response.
  • Students who communicate and stay flexible usually pass comfortably; those needing structure get frustrated.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

Many students call it an easy A with straightforward projects and if you show effort.

; online is still easy but .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

72/100

Child development content is light and straightforward for engaged students, not conceptually brutal.

Both formats rate low difficulty; online stress is organizational more than intellectual.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

and early discussion posts; others are flexible if you communicate.

Recent in-person notes mandatory but flexible with communication; .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

52/100

Fans love her passion and ease; , and .

; online leans more disappointed.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

72/100

Often described as an and flexible, though .

Format shift

and easy-A comments dominate; a few in-person and online call tests off-topic.

Workload

Light

70/100

Projects and discussions are usually manageable; the pain is timing and organization, not volume.

Format shift

; recent ones call coursework straightforward.

Teaching experience

Average

55/100

Passionate and caring with useful stories, but chronic disorganization and poor communication hurt the experience.

Format shift

In-person warmth is stronger; online communication failures are sharper.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Mix of , and occasional midterms.

Format shift

and open-note tests; online focuses more on projects and delayed grades.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

30 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In person she is often called sweet, inspirational, and flexible, with straightforward projects and , but .

Main concern

, and .

What students said

“Mrs. Coleman is the sweetest old lady ever”
CDEV31A
“ . and is an easy A”
CDEV026
“horrible and responding to emails, giving work back or staying on schedule”
CDEV31A

Remote format

Online

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online sections draw more complaints about no responses, late or , and unclear setup, even when the class is easy.

Main concern

Unresponsiveness and grades not posted until the end leave students in the dark.

What students said

“ ”
CDEV021
“NOTHING had been graded by the time of the final so I was completely in the dark”
CDEV021
“this class and professor was pretty easy going and the flow of the ”
ECE26

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Several students report open-note tests, take-home exams, study guides, or class input on exam format.

Open NotesTake-Home TestsStudy GuidesClass Chooses Format

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

78/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person students report open-note tests with , and sometimes student-chosen exam formats.

Open NotesTake-Home TestsStudy Guides
“ ”
CDEV026
“ ”
CDEV072
“She lets the class decide how tests and ”
CDEV31A

Online

Online reviews rarely detail exam proctoring; focus is late grading and .

Unclear Grade Timing
“NOTHING had been graded by the time of the final so I was completely in the dark”
CDEV021

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She's kind and understanding and an easy A if you have a passion for children too.”

Voice snapshots generated from 35 reviews across in-person and online CDEV courses, balancing care against disorganization. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

55/100

“She is so nice and has awesome ideas, but is horrible and responding to emails, giving work back or staying on schedule”

👍 Recommendation Rate

52/100

“I LOVE THIS PROFESSOR I WISH SHE CAN TEACH ALL THE CDEV CLASSES”

🗂️ Organization Reality

30/100

“ !!!!!”

⚖️

78/100

“ and is an easy A!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Mrs. Coleman is the sweetest old lady ever
  • , and fair with grading

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Easy A
  • She doesnt update the grades for about 8 weeks each time
  • Easy A, but unclear!

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • very inspirational
  • makes everyone feel included
  • has a passion for children
  • LOVE HER!!

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

35

Recent reviews read by the AI

35

Lifetime ratings

80/100

Evidence confidence

Thirty-five reviews over many years show stable themes of kindness plus disorganization, with enough detail for medium-high confidence.

Inside 35 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 517
4 out of 53
3 out of 56
2 out of 54
1 out of 55

Course coverage

CDEV0216 reviews
CDEV31A6 reviews
CDEV0264 reviews
ECE263 reviews
CDEV272 reviews
Show 13 more courses
CDEV32A2 reviews
203841 review
476311 review
772881 review
CDEV031B1 review
CDEV0341 review
CDEV0541 review
CDEV0721 review
CDEV211 review
CDEV311 review
CDEV31B1 review
CDEV341 review
CHDEV34881 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

15 reported outcomes

A range

7

A+ 1 · A 6

B range

3

B+ 2 · B 1

C range

3

C+ 1 · C 2

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Not sure yet 2