AI Rate Professor

English

Jide Osikomaiya

ENG1A · ENG030 · ENG001A · ENG1D · ENG1B · ENG001B · ENGE1D · ENGLI1D · ENGLISH1D · ENG79 · ENGONED · ENG30 · 42 lifetime ratings

AI rating
29/100
RMP rating
2.7/5
Take again
31.58%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

Avoid unless you already write to a strict template and and grade risk.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough graderSlow gradingFormat pedanticAI accusationsPolarizing
  • Recent reviews describe harsh zeros for format, AI flags, and .
  • Workload is heavy on essays and .
  • Older in-person fans exist, but overall recommendation rate is low and newer experiences are often toxic.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

32/100

Even strong writers report letter-grade drops, zeros for tiny format issues, and tough essay scrutiny.

Online reviews are harsher on grade risk; .

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Content is often described as manageable, but volume of reading and .

and papers; online adds instruction confusion.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

28/100

Many reviews mark attendance mandatory with skip-class-you-will-not-pass tags and participation weight.

online.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

30/100

Would-take-again sits near one-third, and recent comments .

Online recent voice is strongly negative; .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

22/100

; zeros for format, AI flags, and microscopic paper deconstruction are common.

Format shift

Harshness is strongest in recent online and .

Workload

Heavy

34/100

, and multiple papers leave little downtime, especially in 1A/1B.

Format shift

Both formats report lots of homework and papers.

Teaching experience

Poor

36/100

Helpful older fans exist, but , and delayed grading dominate recent tone.

Format shift

In-person older reviews are warmer; online recent reviews are largely awful.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

22/100

Courses are , and papers rather than traditional exams.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

33 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

some praise helpful literary analysis and interesting readings, while others cite boring , and weeks-long grading delays.

Main concern

to improve before the next paper.

What students said

“he gave me a 0 because I had submitted it as a google docs instead of a words document or PDF.”
ENG001A
“It takes him .”
ENG1B
“As long as you show up to class, do the work, and be respectful, you will get a good grade.”
ENG001A

Remote format

Online

9 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

Online sections draw the harshest recent reviews: zeros for format, AI detection penalties, missing rubrics, and slow or .

Main concern

and communication blackouts can destroy your transcript.

What students said

“ and will give you a zero if it isn't exactly how they want the ”
ENG1B
“gives 0% for ANY Ai detection yet expects you to grab information from the provided text.”
ENG1A
“ . Doesn't respond to messages from students”
ENG1B

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment centers on strictly formatted essays with harsh deductions rather than classic proctored exams.

Essay-heavyStrict format rulesFew or no testsSlow feedback

Assessment risk

Standard

52/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and participation; one student lost a final to wrong file type with no chance to resubmit.

Essay final riskParticipation mattersMandatory attendanceDelayed paper grades
“he gave me a 0 because I had submitted it as a google docs instead of a words document or PDF.”
ENG001A
“NO TESTS. Stories are onlin”
ENG1B

Online

Online students describe zero-tolerance essay format and .

Strict essay formatAI detection zerosNo clear rubricsSlow grading
“This professor will completely fail essays if the format isn't exactly the way he wants it”
ENG001A
“ , and throws attitude when you do something incorrectly”
ENG1B

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“He will accuse you of . Horrible. Look for someone better.”

Voice snapshots generated from 42 reviews spanning online and . Credibility rating: High.

⚠️

22/100

“ and will give you a zero if it isn't exactly how they want the ”

🐢 Recommendation Risk

30/100

“ ”

⏳

34/100

“It takes him .”

Theme 1

📝

  • finds any little flaw to drop you 2 letter grades

Theme 2

📣 About Communication

  • very unprofessional and does not answer your questions

Theme 3

⚖️ Mixed Older Praise

  • As long as you show up to class, do the work, and be respectful, you will get a good grade.
  • Professor Osikomaiya is very helpful
  • Easy A class.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

42

Recent reviews read by the AI

42

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

Forty-two reviews across many years and both formats with consistent tough-grader and .

Inside 42 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 510
4 out of 59
3 out of 54
2 out of 53
1 out of 516

Course coverage

ENG001A10 reviews
ENG1B8 reviews
ENG1D7 reviews
ENG795 reviews
ENG1A4 reviews
Show 7 more courses
ENGLISH1D2 reviews
ENG001B1 review
ENG0301 review
ENG301 review
ENGE1D1 review
ENGLI1D1 review
ENGONED1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

22 reported outcomes

A range

8

A+ 1 · A 7

B range

4

B+ 1 · B 3

C range

4

C+ 1 · C 3

D range

0

No reported values

F

2

F 2

No letter grade reported

4

Drop/Withdrawal 2 · Rather not say 2