AI Rate Professor

Reading

Kathryn Walkowiec

ENG078A · ENG1A · ENG001A · 001A · ENG78A · 14 lifetime ratings

AI rating
48/100
RMP rating
3.4/5
Take again
64.29%
Difficulty
3.3

The decision

if you and adapt to her strict writing expectations.

Best fit · Effort For RewardDisorganized SyllabusCaringTough GraderHeavy ReadingPolarizing
  • and unfair, disorganized grader.
  • English 1A , and a research paper.
  • Attendance and following her exact writing style are repeatedly stressed.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

42/100

Many earn As with effort, but tough grading, particular writing style, and .

Online and failure stories.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

lots of reading and but time-consuming.

and paper-focused work.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

22/100

Attendance is repeatedly mandatory with skip-class-you-won't-pass messaging.

Evidence is strongest in in-person ENG1A reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

55/100

About two-thirds take-again with strong love-or-hate split on organization and fairness.

Older reviews are warmer; several recent in-person ENG1A reviews strongly advise against her.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

36/100

Tough grader tags, style-specific corrections, late work refusals, and reports of almost no one passing appear often.

Format shift

and in-person recent ENG1A reviews.

Workload

Heavy

38/100

Students report , and a major research paper.

Format shift

Workload intensity is similar online and in person.

Teaching experience

Average

54/100

Positive students praise feedback and care; negative students cite disorganization, silence on emails, and .

Format shift

older online praise.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

28/100

, and a research paper more than traditional exams.

Format shift

Both formats center papers and .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

10 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

and feedback but also report no makeups, syllabus chaos, and failing class remnants.

Main concern

Inconsistent syllabus and inflexible emergency policies.

What students said

“She doesn't even go by her own syllabus and even if you have a family emergency, she still won't let you make up for it.”
ENG1A
“I would highly recommend her to anyone looking for a great english teacher.”
ENG001A

Remote format

Online

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online comments range from and unclear assignments.

Main concern

Syllabus confusion and particular writing style requirements.

What students said

“Not to mention she was everywhere with .”
ENG1A
“If you don't get something you don't understand she is always there to help you.”
ENG078A

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment is paper- and ; few comments detail closed-book exam software.

Research PaperEssaysReading AssignmentsRubrics

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and unfair or inconsistent grading of written work.

Research PaperRubricsReading Heavy
“So the main component to this class is a research paper.”
ENG001A

Online

, and strict writing style rather than proctored exams.

EssaysLots of HomeworkStrict Writing Style
“We had a lot of homework and even essays.”
ENG1A

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She doesn't even go by her own syllabus and even if you have a family emergency, she still won't let you make up for it.”

Voice snapshots generated from 14 reviews, highlighting polarity between care and disorganization. Credibility rating: Medium.

📋 Organization Issues

35/100

“her syllabus was just so disorganized and she did not even follow it.”

❤️ Caring Side

70/100

“She really cares about her students and her .”

⚖️

36/100

“If you did not write how she wanted (which is her style of writing) she would correct you.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • great at explaining specific grammatical rules
  • Amazing lectures

Theme 2

📉

  • Doesnt follow the syllabus
  • Grades unfairly
  • refused to grade it because it was too late

Theme 3

📚 About Course Work

  • You're
  • main component to this class is a research paper
  • assignments but they aren't at all difficult

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

14

Recent reviews read by the AI

14

Lifetime ratings

68/100

Evidence confidence

14 reviews with and useful detail, but smaller sample and conflicting eras reduce certainty.

Inside 14 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 58
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 55

Course coverage

ENG1A7 reviews
ENG078A3 reviews
ENG001A2 reviews
001A1 review
ENG78A1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

13 reported outcomes

A range

10

A+ 3 · A 7

B range

0

No reported values

C range

1

C- 1

D range

1

D+ 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Rather not say 1