AI Rate Professor

Spanish

Rebecca Camacho

SPANISH4 · SPAN020304 · SPAN002 · SPAN001 · 21 lifetime ratings

AI rating
22/100
RMP rating
2.1/5
Take again
16.67%
Difficulty
3.6

The decision

Avoid unless and tolerate strict, unforgiving grading.

Best fit · Self Taught ProTough GraderNo LecturesSelf-Teach HeavyProctorio RequiredUnresponsive
  • Most students report no real teaching and heavy reliance on McGraw Hill or online textbooks.
  • and cheating accusations are common complaints.
  • Workload and exams are heavy; online sections often require Proctorio with camera on.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

18/100

, and frequent low grades make an A extremely hard to earn.

Both online and ; online adds proctoring stress.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

Spanish content is already hard, and students say they must learn almost everything alone from the online book.

Difficulty is high in both formats; online amplifies self-teaching pressure.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

22/100

Most reviews mark attendance mandatory, with and little flexibility.

and in-person comments.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

16/100

Vast majority urge students to pick another professor due to unhelpful teaching and harsh policies.

Negative recommendation tone is consistent across online and in-person reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

15/100

, and zero-score disputes show very unforgiving grading.

Format shift

of proctoring-related score losses.

Workload

Overwhelming

18/100

Daily or near-daily , and oral assignments create an excessive load.

Format shift

Online reviews emphasize excessive assignments; and stacked exams.

Teaching experience

Poor

24/100

Students say she rarely lectures, ignores emails, and leaves learning to the textbook.

Format shift

Both formats criticize lack of teaching; a few older positive outliers exist mainly in person.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

72/100

Tests, quizzes, and oral exams dominate grading, with .

Format shift

Online stresses Proctorio quizzes and exams; and quizzes.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

10 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person students also report cold delivery, test-heavy structure, and .

Main concern

Exams and help.

What students said

“There is no instruction or lectures she simply uses the courses online texts and expects people to follow without issue.”
SPAN001
“This class was entirely .”
SPAN002
“ .!!!!! She was no help at all, the book was the only one teaching.”
SPAN001

Remote format

Online

11 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

, and unforgiving, with Proctorio exams and little instructional support.

Main concern

, and grade changes when students score too well.

What students said

“Many students .”
SPAN002
“makes us download spyware (proctorio) and exams, and we are forced to turn our cameras on during a test.”
SPAN001
“Basically, she uses the McGrawhill program for the entirety of her course.”
SPAN002

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams and , and graded very strictly.

ProctorioCamera RequiredTest HeavyPop QuizzesHarsh Oral Grading

Assessment risk

Strict

22/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and quiz point blocks and little instructional support.

Test HeavyPop QuizzesHigh Exam Points
“Dropped her class due to the exams (450 points) and quizzes (150) points being on the same day consecutively for the semester.”
SPAN001
“Halfway through the semester, she decided to increase the cheating.”
SPAN002

Online

; tech glitches and restarts are common.

ProctorioCamera RequiredRestarted ExamsTest Heavy
“makes us download spyware (proctorio) and exams, and we are forced to turn our cameras on during a test.”
SPAN001
“unforgiving of technological issues regarding proctoring applications she implemented.”
SPAN002

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Camacho is a TERRIBLE professor. She can't give a proper lecture.”

Voice snapshots generated from 21 reviews, highlighting teaching, grading, and proctoring themes. Credibility rating: High.

📉 Teaching Quality

24/100

“She did not teach us a thing and expected us to teach ourselves through the book”

🚫 Recommendation Rate

16/100

“ .!!!!!”

⚖️

15/100

“This professor wants you to fail. She doubled the weight of ”

📚 Workload Intensity

18/100

“Very excessive in assignments. Every hour u are late 1 point will be deducted.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • . .
  • the book was the only one teaching
  • she simply uses the courses online texts

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • Extremely disrespectful and unclear.
  • Don't be surprised if she accuses you of cheating.
  • so harshly

Theme 3

💻

  • forced to turn our cameras on during a test

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

21

Recent reviews read by the AI

21

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

21 detailed reviews across years and both formats show , and workload.

Inside 21 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 55
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 514

Course coverage

SPAN00111 reviews
SPAN0028 reviews
SPAN0203041 review
SPANISH41 review

Reported outcomes

C range results lead the reported letter grades.

15 reported outcomes

A range

3

A+ 1 · A 2

B range

2

B+ 1 · B 1

C range

4

C+ 1 · C 3

D range

1

D+ 1

F

2

F 2

No letter grade reported

3

Drop/Withdrawal 2 · Rather not say 1