AI Rate Professor

Health Science

Suzanne Maestas

FCS06 · FCS001 · NUTR10 · FCS006 · FCS6 · 26 lifetime ratings

AI rating
74/100
RMP rating
4.0/5
Take again
66.67%
Difficulty
2.0

The decision

Solid pick for an easier nutrition GE if you follow PowerPoints and deadlines, but budget for required software and .

Best fit · Easy A HunterPowerPoint DrivenExtra Credit HeavyEasy Nutrition GEStrict on ProjectsMixed Personality
  • Most students call FCS/nutrition easy if you use PowerPoints, do weekly work, and grab .
  • ; lowest scores and sometimes the .
  • A minority slam confusing projects, iProfile fees, cold demeanor, or .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

, and simple weekly work make As common when students stay consistent.

Both formats support easy As, with .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

76/100

Material is common-sense , though later chapters can tighten up.

In-person and online both describe beginner-level content.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

55/100

Some say show up matters and ; others say knowing the info for quizzes is enough.

; online mostly no mandatory seat time.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

66/100

Many recommend for ease and and a few harsh project stories.

Older in-person lean positive; recent online is more mixed.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

62/100

Usually fair with EC and dropped low quizzes, but hard.

Format shift

.

Workload

Light

74/100

Weekly short homework, discussions, and biweekly quizzes stay light if .

Format shift

Similar light weekly load online and in person.

Teaching experience

Good

72/100

Knows the material and , though some find lectures slide-reading, cold, or unhelpful.

Format shift

In-person warmth is mixed; online help quality is more criticized.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

35/100

Homework, discussions, quizzes, and a make-or-break exam.

Format shift

Both formats quiz and assignment driven.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

20 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person nutrition is widely seen as straightforward with , and an easy project if done on time.

Main concern

A few older reviews call her a and fast lecturer who needs serious study.

What students said

“Ms. Maestas pretty much laid out a blueprint to get an A.”
FCS006
“You don't need the textbook because the same exact info .”
FCS6

Remote format

Online

6 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

Online FCS6 is often simple weekly homework, discussions, and quizzes, yet some report confusing iProfile work, thin lectures, and a .

Main concern

and limited help on paid software can tank .

What students said

“ IF CAN All you do is discussion posts, 10 question homework, and quiz's.”
FCS6
“she gave me a 0/100 saying this wasn't my own information as if i didn't spend 5 hours on it. DROPPED the class gladly”
FCS006

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessments are mostly short MC quizzes from slides and if you keep an A.

Multiple Choice QuizzesDrop Lowest QuizPowerPoint-BasedOptional Final if High Grade

Assessment risk

Standard

68/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and homework, with lowest score often dropped.

Multiple Choice QuizzesDrop Lowest ScorePowerPoint Based
“Tests are every other week and they are always multiple choice, and end of the semester.”
FCS6
“If you have an A at the end of the semester .”
FCS006

Online

; no webcam or Lockdown Browser is mentioned in reviews.

Two-Attempt QuizzesWeekly HomeworkNo Proctoring Mentioned
“ quizzes that could be taken twice”
FCS006
“Every other week there's a .”
FCS6

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Really interesting and easy class. Ms. Maestas pretty much laid out a blueprint to get an A.”

Voice snapshots generated from 26 nutrition and FCS reviews, balancing easy-A majority views with project and personality critiques. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

72/100

“Super good at explaining things that the class .”

🅰️ Easy A Path

78/100

“Just do the work right and you'll get an A.”

👍 Recommendation

66/100

“Overall this class was simple and informative so .”

⚠️ Project Risk

20/100

“i spent 4-5 hours on this assignment and she gave me a 0/100 saying this wasn't my own information”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She's funny makes class very interesting
  • She totally works with you to make sure that you completely understand the material
  • the only critique I have is that she isn't the nicest

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • IF CAN
  • She offers tons of easy
  • by her

Theme 3

📚 About Materials

  • You don't need the textbook because the same exact info
  • the iProfile account was about $30 and mandatory
  • COPY THE POWERPOINT SLIDES SO

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

26

Recent reviews read by the AI

26

Lifetime ratings

80/100

Evidence confidence

26 reviews over many years with recurring PowerPoint and .

Inside 26 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 514
4 out of 57
3 out of 52
2 out of 51
1 out of 52

Course coverage

FCS00611 reviews
FCS68 reviews
FCS064 reviews
FCS0012 reviews
NUTR101 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

9 reported outcomes

A range

5

A+ 1 · A 4

B range

2

B+ 1 · B 1

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Drop/Withdrawal 1