AI Rate Professor

Chemistry

Lula Abusalih

3A50798 · CHEM3A · 19 lifetime ratings

AI rating
44/100
RMP rating
3.1/5
Take again
47.37%
Difficulty
3.2

The decision

Only take her if and outside videos; expect and uneven help.

Best fit · Self Taught ProTough GraderTest HeavyHard to ReachUnclear LecturesPolarized Reviews
  • and while older reviews praise clarity and care.
  • Grades can still land as A or B if and and tests.
  • In-person attendance is often mandatory and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

Many students still report A or B grades, but , and confusing labs mean you must study hard for that grade.

Online reviews more often mention and droppable exams; and tough grading.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

36/100

Chemistry content plus fast labs and when grades land okay.

Both formats call the material hard; summer online intensives feel especially packed.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

28/100

as mandatory, while online sections treat live Zoom as helpful but not always required.

and hybrid reviews; online is more flexible.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

46/100

About half would take her again, with glowing older .

Older online and ; 2022-2023 reviews mostly say avoid.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

48/100

Tough-grader tags and and some .

Format shift

Online students more often cite ; .

Workload

Moderate

44/100

Expect and .

Format shift

Both formats report lab and ; .

Teaching experience

Average

48/100

Some call lectures clear and caring, but and .

Format shift

than some online summer reviews.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

68/100

.

Format shift

Online comments spell out labs around 50% and exams around 30%.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

10 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person and hybrid students report , and frequent claims she does not explain well, though a few older reviews loved her lectures.

Main concern

Students and expects you to teach yourself from videos or directions.

What students said

“SHE DOES'NT KNOW HOW TO TEACH! table and expects you to read the directions yourself.”
CHEM3A
“ and the ”
CHEM3A
“Her lectures made it very easy to understand everything she was going over”
CHEM3A

Remote format

Online

9 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online CHEM3A is lecture- and test-heavy with awkward exam windows, slow or , and mixed praise for .

Main concern

Hard to reach her by message and lectures or PPTs often feel unhelpful.

What students said

“lectures are long and poorly made. Ppts are equally unhelpful.”
CHEM3A
“Most of the . If you don't slack you'll pass.”
CHEM3A
“She is not a . !”
CHEM3A

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are generally hard and high-stakes, often online with limited .

Test HeavyHard ExamsFixed Exam WindowsOnline Exams

Assessment risk

Standard

42/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person and hybrid reviews call exams hard and sometimes online even when class is hybrid, with little proof of open-book policy.

Hard ExamsTest HeavyOnline Exam Components
“ ! (their all online). .”
CHEM3A
“Exams are taken 6-9 on a Friday night.”
CHEM3A

Online

Online students report several timed exams, some Friday night 6-9 windows, and mixed .

Timed Online ExamsExam Window 6-9Multiple ExamsExtra Credit
“The exam times were annoying, only open 6-9.”
CHEM3A
“There were 5 exams (including a .”
CHEM3A

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“SHE DOES'NT KNOW HOW TO TEACH! table and expects you to read the directions yourself.”

Voice snapshots generated from 19 reviews spanning both online and in-person CHEM3A sections, with credibility High due to sample size and polarized but detailed comments.

🎯 Teaching Quality

48/100

“she didn't really know how to teach. I get that chemistry is hard but i feel like more explanation should have .”

👍 Recommendation Split

46/100

“ .”

📝

42/100

“ ! (their all online). .”

⭐ When It Works

70/100

“Don't ruin your GPA by taking another prof!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • SHE DOES'NT KNOW HOW TO TEACH!
  • lectures are long and poorly made
  • Her lectures made it very easy to understand everything

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • and the
  • If you don't slack you'll pass
  • she is not a

Theme 3

📬 About Access and Feedback

  • What makes her difficult is the ability to reach her

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

19

Recent reviews read by the AI

19

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

Nineteen detailed reviews across 2017-2023 cover both formats with consistent recent criticism and older praise, so the split pattern is reliable.

Inside 19 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 57
4 out of 52
3 out of 51
2 out of 54
1 out of 55

Course coverage

CHEM3A18 reviews
3A507981 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

16 reported outcomes

A range

10

A+ 2 · A 8

B range

4

B 3 · B- 1

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values