AI Rate Professor

Philosophy

Nathan Milnik

PHILO06 · MPHILO4154 · PHILO40 · ETHICS · PHILO6 · PHIL092112 · 24 lifetime ratings

AI rating
52/100
RMP rating
3.5/5
Take again
47.06%
Difficulty
3.3

The decision

Take him only if you read independently, attend lectures, and and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProGet ready to readLecture heavyTest heavySlow email repliesHilarious but off-topic
  • Passionate, funny lectures help if you do the and show up.
  • , and a few papers with .
  • , and pop quizzes frustrate many; .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

38/100

An A is possible with reading and participation, but grades , and .

Online and ; online adds communication risk that can sink a final.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

32/100

, and lecture-heavy material make content hard for many.

Both formats call material challenging; online summer sections felt especially compressed.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

28/100

Many reviews say attendance is mandatory or that skipping means you will not pass because lectures unlock the reading.

In-person strongly ties success to showing up; .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

47/100

; fans love passion and humor while others cite poor teaching support and .

Online is more mixed and includes a ; and avoid.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

35/100

Tough grader and few high-stakes items appear often; .

Format shift

; online friction is more about response delays than point rules.

Workload

Heavy

35/100

, and tests; homework volume varies but cognitive load is high.

Format shift

Both formats demand lots of reading; online still expects chapter work on a tight timeline.

Teaching experience

Average

58/100

Passionate, hilarious, clarifying lectures for many; others find him unhelpful, off-topic, or bad at email and handwriting.

Format shift

In-person teaching praise is common; online adaptation and communication draw more criticism.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

75/100

Test heavy with pop quizzes, timed quizzes, exams, and sometimes only a few papers and .

Format shift

and pop-quiz heavy; online still uses quizzes, discussions, and finals.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

21 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In person he is often funny, passionate, and clarifying on dense readings, but attendance and and .

Main concern

Off-topic lectures, tough or few high-stakes assessments, and .

What students said

“If you do the readings and show up to class you will be fine”
PHILO06
“He does not offer any or so your test grades matter!!”
PHILO06

Remote format

Online

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

interesting and chill for some, but email silence and case.

Main concern

Slow or and slow grade posting make progress hard to track online.

What students said

“he never replied to a single one”
PHILO40
“ a timely manner”
PHILO06

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams and and picky, with and occasional pop quizzes.

Pop quizzesTimed T/F quizzesTest heavyConfusing wordingFew graded items

Assessment risk

Strict

35/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In person, pop quizzes, scantrons, timed short quizzes, and ; some get essay prompts early.

Beware of pop quizzesTest heavyTimed 15-minute quizzesEssay questions sometimes given early
“10 question quizzes, each question worth two points & only 15 minutes to complete”
PHILO06
“ ”
PHILO06

Online

and delayed support; one student lost a and got no email help. Reviews do not clearly prove proctoring software.

Online final exam riskSlow grading feedbackReading-based quizzes
“ it due to poor internet connection”
PHILO40
“This class was definitely one of the most challenging I've ever taken”
PHILO6

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ if you are not an independent learner!!”

Voice snapshots generated from 24 , and mixed recommendation. Credibility rating: High.

📚 Reading and Independence

32/100

“If you don't read, you won't pass the class”

🎯 Teaching Passion

58/100

“He is clearly very passionate about his job and teaching it”

📧 Communication Issues

30/100

“He is pretty bad at responding to emails and Canvas messages”

🧪 Test Pressure

35/100

“ !!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He is a very funny teacher, very opinionated
  • his lectures will help you understand the reading
  • Tends to get off topic alot during class

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • Get ready to read
  • , but
  • The class is not easy if you slack off, but with hard work you will do great

Theme 3

📬 About Support and Feedback

  • he never replied to a single one
  • The quizzes and to see an actual grade
  • He's really cool and understanding

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

24

Recent reviews read by the AI

24

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

24 reviews across years with mixed tones, detailed comments, and , and communication.

Inside 24 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 56
4 out of 59
3 out of 52
2 out of 55
1 out of 52

Course coverage

PHILO0618 reviews
ETHICS2 reviews
MPHILO41541 review
PHIL0921121 review
PHILO401 review
Show 1 more courses
PHILO61 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

19 reported outcomes

A range

10

A+ 1 · A 7 · A- 2

B range

3

B 2 · B- 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

2

D+ 1 · D 1

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

3

Not sure yet 2 · Rather not say 1