AI Rate Professor

English

K Ruzak

ENG1A · ENG79 · ENGLISH1A · 8 lifetime ratings

AI rating
28/100
RMP rating
2.1/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
3.6

The decision

Avoid unless and and textbook-only lectures.

Best fit · Self Taught ProTough graderReads from textbookMany papersDull lecturesAvoid if possible
  • Students widely criticize lectures as engagement.
  • Heavy paper and and .
  • Zero stated willingness to take again among those who answered; .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

32/100

Tough grading like Berkeley-level standards and .

.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

35/100

, and unclear lectures make the course feel hard beyond raw content level.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

45/100

work; others say missing a day is okay if you catch up.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

18/100

Would-take-again is effectively zero and comments .

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

28/100

and said to grade like English major Berkeley standards; few high grades reported.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

25/100

Multiple essays of 3-5 pages, weekly writing, and lots of .

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Poor

28/100

Dominant theme is reading aloud from the book, dull voice, little clarification, and occasional rudeness.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

22/100

and .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

8 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person ENG1A and ENG79 reviews describe boring textbook readings, lots of , and little real teaching.

Main concern

Poor lecture clarity, heavy papers, and harsh or .

What students said

“she only reads from the text book but .”
ENG1A
“Literally all class period long she just read to the class from the textboot; that's it!”
ENGLISH1A
“DO NOT WASTE YOUR TIME!!!”
ENG79

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews focus on essays and homework; they do .

Many essaysHomework self-correctionPaper-heavy

Assessment risk

Varies

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and ; exam format details are not clearly proven in comments.

3-5 page essaysLots of writingSelf-corrected homework
“Has four essays that are all 3-5 pages long. Get ready to work haha.”
ENGLISH1A
“5 essays with .”
ENG1A
“She is lazy teacher!She didnt teach at all. She just gives you a lot of homework and you correct it yourself.”
ENG1A

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“DO NOT WASTE YOUR TIME!!! I took eng 79 and she assigned so and never corrected it just looked to see if it was done!”

Voice snapshots generated from 8 in-person reviews focused on lecture quality and paper load. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

28/100

“she only reads from the text book but .”

👎 Recommendation

18/100

“ .”

📝 Workload

25/100

“ so get ready to write (3-5pg) every week printed!”

⚖️

28/100

“Grades your work as if you're an English major trying to get into Berkeley.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Really boring class since she just reads from the textbook most of the time
  • Her voice makes me sleep literally
  • She was an extremely rude and sarcastic teacher

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Get ready to work haha
  • out of 30 only 8 finished and out of that only 4 passed

Theme 3

📚 About Workload

  • Lots of homework and writing
  • she assigned so and never corrected it

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

8

Recent reviews read by the AI

8

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

Only 8 in-person reviews over several years; tone is consistently negative but sample size is modest.

Inside 8 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 51
3 out of 52
2 out of 52
1 out of 53

Course coverage

ENG1A5 reviews
ENGLISH1A2 reviews
ENG791 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

1

A- 1

B range

1

B 1

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values