AI Rate Professor

Nursing

Carol Higashi

NURSADN009 · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
14/100
RMP rating
1.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

Avoid if ; one dated review paints a harsh, unhelpful clinical instructor.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough GraderHarsh Clinical EvaluatorNot SupportiveHard to Pass
  • Single clinical review describes harsh, fault-finding grading instead of teaching.
  • Student felt marked down for minor errors rather than coached on correct practice.
  • ; and experience was negative.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

22/100

and fault-finding clinical evaluation made passing difficult even while precepting.

Evidence .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

Clinical expectations felt hard because errors were punished rather than taught.

Evidence .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

15/100

.

Evidence .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

10/100

and unkind clinical presence.

Evidence .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

12/100

; student said she marked anything wrong instead of teaching.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

45/100

Workload details are limited; stress came more from evaluation style than volume.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Awful

12/100

Described as not nice and focused on finding faults rather than teaching correctly.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Clinical performance evaluation dominated the experience over traditional exams.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

as fault-finding and unsupportive rather than teaching.

Main concern

Harsh clinical evaluation that marks down minor mistakes instead of coaching.

What students said

“She would find anything you did wrong and mark you down, instead of teaching the correct way.”
NURSADN009

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews ; assessment was clinical evaluation.

Assessment risk

Standard

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Clinical evaluation focused on catching mistakes rather than coaching correct practice.

Clinical EvaluationHarsh Deduction Style
“She would find anything you did wrong and mark you down, instead of teaching the correct way.”
NURSADN009

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She would find anything you did wrong and mark you down, instead of teaching the correct way.”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 . Credibility rating: Low.

👎 Teaching Support

12/100

“ ”

⚖️

12/100

“She would find anything you did wrong and mark you down, instead of teaching the correct way.”

🚫

10/100

“No”

Theme 1

👨‍⚕️ About Clinical Teaching

  • She would find anything you did wrong and mark you down, instead of teaching the correct way.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • She made it very hard for me to pass even though I was precepting with someone

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

18/100

Evidence confidence

Only one detailed but old 2018 clinical review; very limited sample and no corroboration.

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

NURSADN0091 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values