AI Rate Professor

Agriculture

Mike Toscano

NRNR · NR02 · HORT004 · HORTHORT · HORT005 · OH30 · HORTICULTU · HOR004 · ONLINHORT · HORT4 · HORTICULTURE · SCIENCE · NR2 · OH · HORT23 · HORT04 · HORT10 · NR002 · NR12 · 44 lifetime ratings

AI rating
22/100
RMP rating
2.5/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
3.2

The decision

Avoid if you can; materials and and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProTough GraderTrick QuestionsBad Spelling NotesUnresponsive EmailsTest Heavy
  • Many students report , and unfair or
  • Online sections draw especially strong complaints about grammar and trick questions
  • A minority find certain courses easy GPA boosts if they grind weekly work

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

48/100

Some sections can yield high grades with steady work, but and .

Online students stress trick tests and low scores; .

Is the course easy?

Standard

42/100

Content difficulty varies by course, but weekly papers, quizzes, and .

Online HORT often feels harder due to bad modules; some NR classes feel easier.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

28/100

Multiple reviews cite mandatory attendance or weekly due dates that force constant presence and work.

Online weekly quizzes and ; in-person labs also demand presence.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

18/100

and frequent warnings about poor teaching, spelling, and unfair tests.

; online complaints are especially loud.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

24/100

Tough grader tags, refused grade bumps, and .

Format shift

Online and .

Workload

Heavy

32/100

Weekly papers, quizzes, and piled assignments are common complaints.

Format shift

Online has weekly reports; and frequent tests.

Teaching experience

Poor

28/100

Students , and mismatched tests.

Format shift

Online quality is especially low; in-person is mixed but still weak overall.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

72/100

Tests and .

Format shift

Online is test-and-paper heavy; .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

39 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

but leans negative: , and tests that mismatch notes.

Main concern

Opaque grade adjustments and .

What students said

“Even if you do the work, get good grades on the to lower your grade without justification.”
HOR004
“Piles work high.”
NR002
“ . Many test questions directly contradicted the text and his lectures.”
NR2

Remote format

Online

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews emphasize bad grammar in , and little accommodation.

Main concern

Typos and vague or and fair scoring.

What students said

“The questions where vague and random compared to ALL the info given during the modules.”
HORT004
“his bad grammar, misspelling, and hard to understand lecture notes are very frustrating!!”
HORT004
“Numerous spelling and grammar errors in every lecture note and test”
HORT004

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

worded questions that students say mismatch modules.

Timed testsTrick questionsTwo tries on testsAmbiguous items

Assessment risk

Strict

35/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

lectures, with ambiguous or extra questions.

Ambiguous test questionsTests mismatch notesWeekly tests
“likes to add questions to the . likes test questions that are ambiguous.”
13675
“ and his lectures.”
NR2

Online

Online tests are timed and , and filled with typos or irrelevant trick items.

Timed testsTrick questionsTwo triesTypos in questions
“The because he tries to trick you with irrelevant things while misspelling so much!”
HORT004
“His tests are timed and . Gives you two tries on every test.”
HOR004

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If you are interested in having the one of Mr. Toscano's classes.”

Voice snapshots generated from 44 reviews (5 online, 39 in , and material quality. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

28/100

“ .”

⚖️

24/100

“he is able to lower your grade without justification.”

📝

35/100

“The questions where vague and random compared to ALL the info given during the modules.”

Theme 1

📝 About Materials & Clarity

  • BAD grammar
  • Numerous spelling and grammar errors
  • Cant even read his short lectures

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Perfect class for a GPA boost

Theme 3

😤 About Character

  • Very cocky
  • Doesn't care about his students
  • plays favorites

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

44

Recent reviews read by the AI

44

Lifetime ratings

84/100

Evidence confidence

Forty-four reviews across years with consistent themes on grammar, tests, and .

Inside 44 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 57
4 out of 57
3 out of 56
2 out of 510
1 out of 514

Course coverage

HORT00411 reviews
NR25 reviews
HORT43 reviews
HORTHORT3 reviews
NR023 reviews
Show 15 more courses
HOR0042 reviews
HORT042 reviews
NR0022 reviews
SCIENCE2 reviews
136751 review
HORT0051 review
HORT101 review
HORT231 review
HORTICULTU1 review
HORTICULTURE1 review
NR121 review
NRNR1 review
OH1 review
OH301 review
ONLINHORT1 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

5 reported outcomes

A range

1

A+ 1

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Not sure yet 1 · Not_Sure_Yet 1