AI Rate Professor

English

Scott Smith

MCOM02 · ENG1A · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
88/100
RMP rating
5.0/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.8

The decision

if and a chance to revise papers, keeping the thin review count in mind.

Best fit · Effort For RewardPaper FeedbackAllows RevisionsFunny LecturerHelpfulCharming
  • and revision opportunities support writing growth.
  • Students find him funny, caring, and consistently rate him a 5.
  • Very small review sample limits certainty about workload and exams.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

70/100

Revisions and , but comments do not describe a free A.

; no online reviews available.

Is the course easy?

Standard

55/100

Difficulty ratings range from easy to challenging; content is standard college English writing.

; no online reviews available.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews do .

; no online reviews available.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

90/100

Every review is a 5 and students explicitly recommend him and say they loved the class.

; no online reviews available.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

78/100

He allows paper revisions and .

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

58/100

Writing-focused courses imply papers and revisions; .

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Excellent

90/100

All four reviews call him funny, helpful, and genuinely interested in teaching.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

28/100

Assessment centers on papers with feedback and .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person English and media courses praised for humor, support, and .

Main concern

Only four reviews; and full workload are barely described.

What students said

“Great teacher overall. He's helpful and .”
MCOM02
“he is a very good teacher, he is funny and makes class interesting.”
ENG1A
“He .”
ENG1A

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews emphasize papers and revisions; .

Paper-Based AssessmentRevisions Allowed

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person courses focus on papers with revision chances; .

Paper FeedbackRevisions Allowed
“He's helpful and .”
MCOM02
“He .”
ENG1A

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Great teacher overall. He's helpful and .”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 in-person reviews, highlighting feedback, revisions, and strong praise. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

90/100

“he is a very good teacher, he is funny and makes class interesting.”

📝

85/100

“He's helpful and .”

♻️ Revision Friendly

78/100

“He .”

👍 Recommendation

90/100

“ . i loved his class.!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • he is funny and makes class interesting.
  • he's a really cool teacher and is always there for his students.
  • He like teaching and wants to teach.

Theme 2

📄

  • .
  • He .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

42/100

Evidence confidence

Only four uniformly positive reviews from 2010-2016 with , and grades.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 54
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ENG1A3 reviews
MCOM021 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

1

A- 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values