AI Rate Professor

English

Candace Andrews

ENG037 · ENG1A · ENG1 · ENG4567 · ENG37 · ENGLI79 · ENGLISH79 · ENG01B · ENG70 · ENG1B · ENGLISH1B · ENGENG · ENGLISH · ENGL79 · ENG79 · 50 lifetime ratings

AI rating
71/100
RMP rating
3.9/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.5

The decision

if you will write consistently and want real English prep; skip if you need a light or easy A class.

Best fit · Effort For RewardHeavy Writing LoadTough Essay GraderHelpful FeedbackMastery Essay PressureGrades Earned
  • Lots of essays, discussions, and weekly writing keep workload high.
  • She is often helpful and , but a tough or .
  • Students who want growth praise her; students wanting easy English often avoid her.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

55/100

Lower courses can feel easy with effort, but , and .

; some comments still describe online workloads.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Writing volume and critical essay standards create solid academic challenge for many students.

; some comments still describe online workloads.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

and reminders, while some online-style comments treat attendance as less central.

Attendance details are mixed across in-person-tagged reviews that sometimes describe online courses.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

68/100

Strong praise for helpfulness and writing growth outweighs a sizable group of and busywork.

; recommendation tone varies across course levels.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

35/100

Many students say , and expects near-flawless writing.

Format shift

Grading comments come from in-person-tagged reviews, including online-mentioned sections.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Repeated reports of many essays, weekly discussions, readings, and high writing volume.

Format shift

Workload comments come from in-person-tagged reviews, including online-mentioned sections.

Teaching experience

Good

72/100

Often called helpful, caring, and clear, though .

Format shift

Teaching comments come from in-person-tagged reviews spanning many years.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

, and mastery writing more than traditional exams.

Format shift

Assessment pattern is consistent across in-person-tagged English reviews.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

50 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Mostly English composition and literature with heavy writing, discussions, and high standards; several students mention .

Main concern

Heavy writing load and GE.

What students said

“Grades are earned, not given! Work hard, turn in , and attend class.”
ENG70
“She gives a ton of work.”
ENG1
“One of the ! I would definitely recommend her to anyone!”
ENG037

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment risk comes mainly from graded essays and mastery writing rather than proctored exams.

Essay HeavyMastery EssayDiscussion PostsGrammar Tests

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Reviews emphasize essays, discussions, and mastery writing; .

Essay HeavyMastery EssayDiscussion PostsGrammar Tests
“You must do all six essays or you won't pass the class.”
ENG1B
“Did not pass mastery essay nor was my profolio good enough.”
ENG1A
“A lot of writing and reading. Average essay 1000 words.”
ENG1B

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Grades are earned, not given! Work hard, turn in , and attend class. You will earn your grade.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 in-person-tagged , and split recommendations. Credibility rating: High.

📚 Heavy Writing

28/100

“She gives a ton of work.”

⚖️

35/100

“ . Very PICKY!”

👍 Strong Recommenders

68/100

“One of the ! I would definitely recommend her to anyone!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Extremely helpful
  • the syllabus
  • she is a and .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • Grades are earned, not given!
  • she is so strict!
  • easy A if you dont mind writing in a journal

Theme 3

✍️ About Workload

  • There's a ton of work, in and out of class.
  • about 6 readings a week and 4 discussion
  • be ready to write and write and write.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

50

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

50 reviews over many years give a stable picture of heavy writing and mixed but mostly positive teaching quality.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 527
4 out of 510
3 out of 53
2 out of 59
1 out of 51

Course coverage

ENG1B16 reviews
ENG7912 reviews
ENG1A4 reviews
ENG374 reviews
ENG0373 reviews
Show 10 more courses
ENG702 reviews
ENG01B1 review
ENG11 review
ENG45671 review
ENGENG1 review
ENGL791 review
ENGLI791 review
ENGLISH1 review
ENGLISH1B1 review
ENGLISH791 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

3

A+ 1 · A 2

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values