AI Rate Professor

English

LL William-White

ENGLISH79 · ENG79 · ENGLISH1A · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
58/100
RMP rating
3.3/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.3

The decision

Prefer her in person if you want a ; be cautious online based on the one poor online review.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyResponsive emailsInteresting readingsFormat-dependentMastery test painSplit reviews
  • , easy topics, and responsiveness.
  • The single online review is harshly negative and .
  • A and guideline changes hurt at least one student.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

Students and report an A-, but the .

; the online review gives no grade path detail.

Is the course easy?

Standard

55/100

Writing topics are called easy, yet difficulty ratings and the mastery test keep the course from feeling introductory.

; online rates difficulty very high.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews do .

Neither online nor .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

55/100

, but the online .

Recommendation is strong in person and very weak online.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

Assignments seem manageable, but .

Format shift

; online review has no grade detail.

Workload

Light

62/100

Comments emphasize readings and .

Format shift

Workload detail .

Teaching experience

Average

58/100

In-person students call her awesome and responsive, while the online student rates quality at the bottom.

Format shift

Teaching praise is in-person; online evidence is strongly negative.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

32/100

Students talk mainly about readings, writing topics, assignments, and a mastery test.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person students liked interesting readings, , and strong teaching despite a .

Main concern

Mastery testing and shifting guidelines can still block a clean pass.

What students said

“ and easy topics to write about. She always responded right away to my emails with any questions!”
ENGLISH1A
“The . They changed the guidelines so I did not pass it, but Ms. White is an awesome teacher!”
ENG79

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

One online ENGLISH79 review calls the experience very poor quality and advises against taking her.

Main concern

Extremely negative quality rating with almost no constructive detail.

What students said

“Very poor quality. .”
ENGLISH79

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment centers on writing work and a mastery test that some students find painful.

Mastery testWriting assignments

Assessment risk

Standard

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and a painful mastery test with changing guidelines.

Mastery testWriting assignments
“I liked her class and did well on all the assignments. The .”
ENG79

Online

Online review .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“I liked her class and did well on all the assignments. The . They changed the guidelines so I did not pass it, but Ms. White is an awesome teacher!”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 reviews (1 online, 2 in person), highlighting format split and mastery-test friction. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

58/100

“Ms. White is an awesome teacher!”

💻 Online Warning

20/100

“Very poor quality. .”

✍️ Assignment Experience

62/100

“ and easy topics to write about.”

📧 Responsiveness

80/100

“She always responded right away to my emails with any questions!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • interesting readings and easy topics to write about
  • Ms. White is an awesome teacher!
  • always responded right away to my emails

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Tests

  • The
  • They changed the guidelines so I did not pass it
  • Very poor quality. .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

32/100

Evidence confidence

Only three reviews across 2012-2015, and .

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

ENG791 review
ENGLISH1A1 review
ENGLISH791 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

1

A- 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values