AI Rate Professor

English

L William

ENG791A · ENG79 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
72/100
RMP rating
3.7/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
2.3

The decision

Prefer her in person for supportive English help; .

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyCaring in personGood feedbackOnline inflexibleWould take againMixed formats
  • Two and .
  • The one online review is harshly negative on support and disabilities.
  • .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

A reported; the online F reflects support issues more than content rigor.

In person looks easy; the sole online review reports an F and high difficulty.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

70/100

In-person students rate difficulty very low; so overall ease is moderate-high.

In-person reviews rate difficulty 1; the online review rates difficulty 5.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

30/100

In-person reviews mark attendance as mandatory; .

.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

72/100

, while the online reviewer would not.

Strong yes in person; negative online experience.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

70/100

In-person students report low difficulty and success; online student saw no or makeup.

Format shift

Leniency appears stronger in person than online.

Workload

Light

72/100

No heavy-workload complaints; volume.

Format shift

Workload details are sparse in both formats.

Teaching experience

Good

70/100

In person she is caring and inspirational; online she is called rude and unhelpful.

Format shift

Teaching quality diverges sharply by format.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

35/100

English developmental courses emphasize writing growth and .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

, and helps them become better writers.

Main concern

Very small sample; .

What students said

“ and ”
ENG79
“Dr. William actually cares and helpedme become a better writer!!!!”
ENG791A

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

One older online ENG79 review calls her unhelpful, rigid, and unsympathetic to disabilities.

Main concern

No or makeup and perceived lack of care for learning disabilities.

What students said

“NOT helpful and could care less about people's learning disabilities!”
ENG79

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews ; experience differs more by support than by testing policy.

Assessment risk

Varies

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

; and learning support.

Online

; student focuses on lack of makeup and .

“NO or make up time whatsoever!”
ENG79

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Dr. William actually cares and helpedme become a better writer!!!!”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 reviews (2 in person, 1 online), highlighting format split in support. Credibility rating: Low.

❤️ In-Person Care

85/100

“Dr. William actually cares and helpedme become a better writer!!!!”

💬 Feedback

80/100

“ and ”

💻 Online Support Gap

15/100

“NOT helpful and could care less about people's learning disabilities!”

Theme 1

❤️ About Character

  • actually cares and helpedme become a better writer!!!!
  • Rude and heartless.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Quality 5 difficulty 1 in person
  • Grade A in ENG791A
  • Grade F in online ENG79

Theme 3

🌐 About Course Format

  • NO or make up time whatsoever!

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

38/100

Evidence confidence

Only three reviews with a and limited detail.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

ENG792 reviews
ENG791A1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values