Frances Miller-Rogers

BUS34 · BIM43 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating: 34/100
RMP rating: 2.7/5
Take again: 0%
Difficulty: 2.3

The decision

; only consider in-person if you can self-manage and chase grades yourself.

Best fit · Self Taught ProUnorganized OnlineLate AssignmentsFrustrating CommunicationHelpful In PersonDo The Work To Pass

Online students report chronic late posts, missing grades, and .
The if you complete all work.
Would-take-again is 0 percent and quality averages only 2.7.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

One student earned an A despite chaos, and the pass, but grading delays undermine certainty.

Online reviews show A is possible but messy; the all work.

Is the course easy?

Standard

55/100

Difficulty ratings sit mid-range with weekly assignments and .

Both formats describe manageable content; online pain is logistics, not subject hardness.

Is attendance flexible?

Optional

85/100

and online work is weekly asynchronous.

; in-person did not address attendance.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

22/100

and two of three reviews strongly discourage her, especially online.

Online reviews are firmly against; the but outdated.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

62/100

An A was awarded and pass is framed as do-the-work, but missing grades and late posts create risk.

Format shift

Online reports unfinished grading; .

Workload

Moderate

52/100

Weekly assignments and load.

Format shift

Both formats mention weekly work without extreme overload language.

Teaching experience

Poor

38/100

Online students call her unorganized and unresponsive while .

Format shift

Online experience is sharply negative; the .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

28/100

, and tests more than high-stakes exams.

Format shift

Online emphasizes weekly posts; and tests.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

One and easy to talk to if you complete weekly work.

Main concern

Only one dated review; may not reflect current practice.

What students said

“ and as long as you do all the assignments, test and go online every week you will pass her class.”
BIM43

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Both , and high frustration despite one A.

Main concern

Chronic disorganization and grades posted without all work graded.

What students said

“I've taken plenty of online classes & this one by far was the .”
BUS34

“She submitted my .”
BUS34

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews focus on weekly assignments and .

Weekly AssignmentsDiscussionsTests Mentioned

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and tests but .

AssignmentsTests

“as long as you do all the assignments, test and go online every week you will pass her class”
BIM43

Online

Online comments discuss weekly assignments and .

Weekly AssignmentsLate Releases

“ however a few were offered as because she didn't open them on time.”
BUS34

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice
“I've taken plenty of online classes & this one by far was the .”
Voice snapshots generated from 3 reviews (2 online, 1 in person), highlighting organization failures . Credibility rating: Low.

📉 Teaching Quality

38/100

“This class was frustrating to say the least.”

🚫 Recommendation

22/100

“ !”

🗂️ Organization Issues

25/100

“ . Unorganized. Very frustrating!”

Theme 1

💻 About Online Organization

submitted my

Theme 2

🏫

easy to talk to if you don't understand
do all the assignments, test and go online every week you will pass

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

Recent reviews read by the AI

Lifetime ratings

35/100

Evidence confidence

Only three old reviews from 2013-2016 with split formats and limited grade data reduce confidence.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51

4 out of 50

3 out of 50

2 out of 51

1 out of 51

Course coverage

BUS342 reviews

BIM431 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

A 1

B range

No reported values

C range

No reported values

D range

No reported values

F

No reported values

No letter grade reported

No reported values

Frances Miller-Rogers

x x x x; only consider in-person if you can self-manage and chase grades yourself.

Four answers before you build your schedule.

FairEffort

Standard

Optional

Avoid

See how this professor fits your week.

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

In person

Online

See what students actually said.

📉 Teaching Quality

🚫 Recommendation

🗂️ Organization Issues

💻 About Online Organization

🏫 x x x

See exactly what the AI read.

Quality ratings

Course coverage

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

A range

B range

C range

D range

F

No letter grade reported

; only consider in-person if you can self-manage and chase grades yourself.

🏫