AI Rate Professor

Health Science

T Hagenburger

NUTRITION · FCS · FCS006 · FCS6 · NUTRITION6 · FCSSECT · 15 lifetime ratings

AI rating
96/100
RMP rating
5.0/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.0

The decision

Must-take nutrition or FCS professor if and a straightforward path to a strong grade.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyMakes Learning FunLecture-Based TestsClear ExplainerInteresting ProjectsNutrition Expert
  • Universally praised with every review at top quality and low-to-moderate difficulty.
  • and are multiple choice; a few simple projects.
  • , but the class is described as easy and enjoyable.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

86/100

Students describe the class as easy with simple projects and .

.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

78/100

Content is approachable and well explained, with low average difficulty and .

.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

48/100

Attendance is not clearly mandatory, but so showing up is strongly advised.

.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

94/100

Every review is glowing, with students wishing more teachers taught like her and recommending her for nutrition.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

80/100

Easy projects and lecture-aligned multiple-choice exams .

Format shift

.

Workload

Light

76/100

Only a few simple projects and ; students call the class easy.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Excellent

96/100

Students consistently call her one of the , and passionate about the material.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

Balanced

48/100

Assessment mixes lecture-based multiple-choice tests with a few simple projects and homework.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

15 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person students call her excellent, funny, and highly engaging, with and simple projects.

Main concern

Missing class can hurt because tests are largely based on in-class notes.

What students said

“Excellent, funny, and homework.”
FCS
“ , so its important to attend or have someone else in class to share notes with.”
FCS006
“ . Always offering help.”
FCS006

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

no reports of harsh proctoring tools.

Multiple ChoiceLecture-BasedIn-Person Final

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

78/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and based on class notes and lectures.

Multiple ChoiceLecture-BasedIn-Person Final
“ ?'s.”
FCS6
“ . Always offering help.”
FCS006

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“I wish there were more teachers like her. She really knows her material and makes everything extremely interesting to learn.”

Voice snapshots generated from 15 in-person reviews (2004-2013), highlighting teaching clarity, ease, and recommendation. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

96/100

“ and she seems like she loves to teach. one of the ”

👍 Recommendation Rate

94/100

“ if you plan on taking nutrition.”

📚 Easy Course Load

86/100

“This class was easy and very well taught. ?'s.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Excellent, funny, and homework.
  • She really knows her material and makes everything extremely interesting to learn.
  • She uses visuals while she speaks so it's easier to connect with the information.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • This class was easy and very well taught.
  • There's a few projects, but they're not hard.
  • Awesome Instructor! Make sure you show for .

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • She was awesome, and so helpful.
  • I loved her!
  • good teacher, nice, interesting

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

15

Recent reviews read by the AI

15

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

Fifteen fully consistent 5-star reviews help, but all are older (2004-2013) with no recent data or grade detail.

Inside 15 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 515
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

FCS0064 reviews
NUTRITION4 reviews
FCS63 reviews
FCS2 reviews
FCSSECT1 review
Show 1 more courses
NUTRITION61 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values