AI Rate Professor

Engineering

. Crawford

ENGR0608 · ENGR17 · ENGR8 · ENGR001 · ETECHENGR · ETECH76 · ENRG1 · CE008 · ETECH13 · ENGR1 · ENG · ENGR · 18 lifetime ratings

AI rating
52/100
RMP rating
3.7/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.6

The decision

Fine for light intro ENGR1 if you like humor; if you need clear technical instruction.

Best fit · Self Taught ProPolarizingFun in IntroUnclear LecturesSelf-Study NeededTalks Too Much
  • Intro ENGR1 is often fun, easy, and highly liked.
  • Statics, circuits, and upper tech classes .
  • .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

55/100

Intro classes feel easy, but some students say grade.

.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Difficulty and circuits content.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

45/100

Some say class is optional, while and lectures feel useless.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

52/100

Loved for intro and personality, strongly avoided for core technical engineering courses.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

35/100

One student says perfect tests can still produce a low course grade, and .

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

52/100

Intro projects and quizzes feel light, while statics and circuits feel heavy and frustrating.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Average

55/100

Many praise humor and care in intro classes; , and off-topic.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

Balanced

58/100

Mix of projects, quizzes, and .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

18 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

intro classes feel fun and easy, while statics and and frustrating.

Main concern

and hard exam content for core engineering courses.

What students said

“use the book to teach yourself. He'll only do the easy stuff in lecture and .”
ENGR8
“His class is fun and easy.”
ENGR1
“He can't solve the problems even with his own notes...”
ENGR0608

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

in statics and circuits.

Hard Exam ContentLecture-Test GapProjects and Quizzes

Assessment risk

Standard

42/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

is covered clearly in lecture.

Hard Exam ContentLecture-Test Gap
“He'll only do the easy stuff in lecture and .”
ENGR8
“you can earn an A but still receive a low grade in the class.”
ENGR0608

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“I DO NOT recommend this guy to anyone who's actually majoring in engineering. and really goes off topic and ignores questions.”

Voice snapshots generated from 18 in-person reviews, highlighting course-level polarization. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

55/100

“ but he doesn't know how to teach.”

👍 Recommendation Split

52/100

“I would take him for other engineering classes definitely.”

📚

40/100

“ENGR 8 students, use the book to teach yourself.”

😄 Intro Class Fun

80/100

“I had him for ENGR 1 and it was a blast.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • tries to instill his knowledge into you with humor and real world examples
  • horrible at lecturing
  • talks way too much

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • His class is fun and easy
  • you can earn an A but still receive a low grade

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • He wants everyone to succeed
  • cares about his student and their success
  • seems like he does not know what he is talking about

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

18

Recent reviews read by the AI

18

Lifetime ratings

68/100

Evidence confidence

Eighteen reviews span many years and show a consistent course-based split between intro praise and technical course criticism.

Inside 18 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 511
4 out of 52
3 out of 50
2 out of 52
1 out of 53

Course coverage

ENGR15 reviews
ENGR06082 reviews
ETECH762 reviews
CE0081 review
ENG1 review
Show 7 more courses
ENGR1 review
ENGR0011 review
ENGR171 review
ENGR81 review
ENRG11 review
ETECH131 review
ETECHENGR1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values