AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

L Marei

MATH80AND82 · MATH081 · MATH80 · MATH3058 · MATH38B · MATH36 · M82 · MATH38AB · MATH82 · 25 lifetime ratings

AI rating
58/100
RMP rating
3.4/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.2

The decision

if you will stay on top of chapter HW gates and can handle a thick accent; self-driven students pass, slackers struggle.

Best fit · Effort For RewardPolarized Math InstructorFlexible Online-Style HWThick AccentChapter GatekeepingRetake Friendly
  • Student experiences are and harsh hard-to-reach grading.
  • Many praise endless HW attempts and reopened tests; others slam locked chapters and unhelpful emails.
  • Accent and board-call teaching style put off some; self-motivated students who grind HW fare better.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

Retakes and reopened tests help, but 70% chapter gates and earn an A.

; several comments describe online-style course platforms.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Content difficulty is average-to-high for developmental math; pace and chapter locks add friction for weaker students.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

; online-style HW can be anytime while in-class sections imply showing up helps.

All evidence is from in-person tagged reviews; .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

52/100

Roughly half love her flexibility and help, , and unhelpful replies, so fit is highly personal.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

52/100

Some praise reopened tests and passable curves; .

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

38/100

Frequent HW with chapter completion gates before tests; several students report tons of .

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Average

58/100

Helpful and clear for motivated students, but accent issues, board calls, and .

Format shift

.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Chapter HW gates unlock tests, with , and occasional full-test reopen windows.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

25 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Mixed in-person and hybrid-style math experience: helpful and flexible for and locked deadlines for others.

Main concern

, and uneven email support can sink struggling students.

What students said

“Absolutly the . Always answers questions fast, understands that life happens and will work with you.”
MATH82
“She requires you to get a 70% on every chapter before moving on to the next, which means if you have trouble with a chapter you are SOL”
MATH82
“Can't understand her, she is not clear at all, and .”
M82

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Tests unlock after 70% HW, have firm , and include a final.

Chapter testsFirm deadlinesOne retake before finalReopened tests on requestLong online final mentioned

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Chapter tests require 70% HW , and occasional full reopen; one long online final noted.

70% HW gateFirm test deadlinesRetakesReopened tests10-hour online final
“She requires all the hw to be 70% done before the . but HW can be done whenever.”
MATH82
“The online final is 10 hours long.”
MATH82
“Twice in the semester she opened all the tests for the whole class so people could raise their grades.”
MATH82

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She was a great professor. Really depends on your relationship with her. I found and I entered this class worried/nervous but I just did my work and it all turned out great.”

Voice snapshots generated from 25 in-person reviews spanning 2003-2012, highlighting split views on flexibility, accent, and grading. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

58/100

“I think Dr. . She's good and also kind. Overall, I'm satisfied with the class. The rest really is up to you.”

📈 Grade & Effort Balance

58/100

“I got A's on all the HW, and did badly on the tests but I still managed to pass with a C.”

⚠️ Polarized Experience

40/100

“It is next to impossible to get an 'A' or even a 'B' in this class. She is the .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • and understandable way.
  • She breaks it down for you, but she does have a thick accent.
  • Can't understand

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • only an idiot wouldnt get a good grade in her class.
  • It is next to impossible to get an 'A' or even a 'B' in this class.
  • If you got a bad grade on a end

Theme 3

📚 About Workload & Structure

  • , but the .
  • Infinite attempts for date.
  • tons of HW. I dropped the class!

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

25

Recent reviews read by the AI

25

Lifetime ratings

78/100

Evidence confidence

25 detailed reviews spanning 2003-2012 with consistent themes on HW gates, accent, and .

Inside 25 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 510
4 out of 54
3 out of 54
2 out of 54
1 out of 53

Course coverage

MATH368 reviews
MATH825 reviews
MATH803 reviews
MATH38AB2 reviews
MATH38B2 reviews
Show 5 more courses
61 review
M821 review
MATH0811 review
MATH30581 review
MATH80AND821 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values