AI Rate Professor

English

Candance Andrew

ENG79 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
52/100
RMP rating
3.5/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.5

The decision

and responsive, but and the sample is too small to trust.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlySyllabus-drivenMixed clarity on papersResponsive messagingReflection papersChanging deadlines
  • Only two reviews and they conflict on organization and
  • One student loved the and quick responses
  • and disliked repeated syllabus changes

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

55/100

; success depends on decoding paper expectations and .

; no online reviews in the input counts.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

62/100

Difficulty ratings are moderate and the course centers on guided writing with reflection papers.

; no online reviews in the input counts.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews .

; no online reviews in the input counts.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

50/100

One student felt fully supported while another experienced a .

; no online reviews in the input counts.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

50/100

No strong evidence of harsh or ; clarity of .

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

55/100

and mastery clustered close together create moderate writing load.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Average

55/100

Responsive and structured for one student, unclear and shifting for another.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

28/100

, and a mastery assignment rather than exams.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

Two in-person-coded ENG79 reviews split between praise for structure and criticism of .

Main concern

and mid-term syllabus changes may create grading uncertainty.

What students said

“There were no surprises. The instructor had the entire course broken down in the syllabus.”
ENG79
“shes nice but i think she only tells us half of what she really wants in a paper.”
ENG79

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Writing-focused assessments include reflections, a final, and a mastery task near each other.

Final assessmentMastery taskReflection papersPaper-focused grading

Assessment risk

Standard

52/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and mastery work close together; exam proctoring details are not proven.

Reflection papersFinalMastery assignment
“She used reflection papers to see what we needed help in.”
ENG79
“she also changed the syllabus about 4 times and we had a final and the mastery within 2 weeks of each other.”
ENG79

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“shes nice but i think she only tells us half of what she really wants in a paper. its a little like a guessing game with her.”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 , and communication. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

55/100

“There were no surprises. The instructor had the entire course broken down in the syllabus.”

📝 Paper Clarity

40/100

“shes nice but i think she only tells us half of what she really wants in a paper.”

📬 Responsiveness

70/100

“She was quick to respond back to a question, or @ least let you know when she'd be unavailable.”

📅 Syllabus Stability

35/100

“she also changed the syllabus about 4 times”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Organization

  • There were no surprises. The instructor had the entire course broken down in the syllabus.
  • she also changed the syllabus about 4 times

Theme 2

📝 About Writing Expectations

  • She used reflection papers to see what we needed help in.
  • only tells us half of what she really wants in a paper
  • its a little like a guessing game with her.

Theme 3

📬 About Communication

  • Although I took the class online, the .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

28/100

Evidence confidence

Only two conflicting older reviews make any conclusion fragile despite some concrete detail.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ENG792 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values