AI Rate Professor

Nursing

Anna Hernandez

NURS005 · NRSNG1 · NRS01 · NURS001 · SKILLLAB · 5 lifetime ratings

AI rating
76/100
RMP rating
4.1/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.0

The decision

Strong pick for nursing clinical insight and support, but be cautious if you land in .

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyStory-Driven MentorClinical InsightInspirational for NursingSkills Lab ConcernsHands-On Support
  • Most students praise her real-world nursing stories and deep clinical knowledge.
  • She is seen as available, supportive, and great for early nursing courses.
  • and frequent cancellations.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

62/100

Difficulty ratings are mostly low and students emphasize learning through stories, but grades and A-effort details are rarely stated.

; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

72/100

Most comments describe low to moderate challenge with .

.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

available comments.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews with .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

74/100

Four of five reviews strongly praise her as a great or phenomenal instructor, .

All .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

64/100

Students focus more on support and knowledge than on harsh or , so but under-documented.

Format shift

In-person only; no grade-distribution detail.

Workload

Light

70/100

Comments emphasize stories, skills practice, and clinical .

Format shift

In-person clinical and skills context only.

Teaching experience

Good

76/100

Most students call her knowledgeable, inspirational, and supportive, though .

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

35/100

Reviews center on clinical skills, stories, and .

Format shift

In-person nursing format only.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person students mostly describe a knowledgeable, story-rich clinical instructor who .

Main concern

and accuracy were criticized in one review.

What students said

“From explaining the essentials of nursing care to making a complex subject enjoyable Ana Hernandez is an inspirational teacher.”
NRSNG1
“She has stories that help to give new students insight into rationals.”
NRS01
“ ! Half the time she's teaching you incorrectly.”
SKILLLAB

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews say little about formal exams and focus more on clinical teaching and skills practice.

Clinical Skills FocusStory-Based Learning

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Comments ; assessment appears skills- and clinical-oriented.

Skills LabClinical Stories
“She is a great skill instructor.”
NRS01
“Ana is a great CI. She has a lot of knowledge and is willing to share.”
NURS005

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Her experience, honesty and natural teaching ability make Ana an answered prayer for any student.”

Voice snapshots generated from 5 in-person reviews spanning 2008-2011, balancing strong clinical . Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

76/100

“She is a phenomenal teacher!”

📖 Real-World Stories

80/100

“Ana has all her stories with her in class which I try to remember on clinical days.”

⚠️

30/100

“If you want to be a .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Ana is a great instructor.
  • inspirational teacher
  • great skill instructor

Theme 2

❤️ About Support & Character

  • willing to share
  • phenomenal teacher

Theme 3

⚠️

  • !
  • teaching you incorrectly
  • constantly cancelling

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

5

Recent reviews read by the AI

5

Lifetime ratings

48/100

Evidence confidence

Five detailed but very old reviews (2008-2011) show mostly consistent praise with one sharp outlier, limiting long-term confidence.

Inside 5 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

NRS011 review
NRSNG11 review
NURS0011 review
NURS0051 review
SKILLLAB1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values