AI Rate Professor

English

H Murray

ENGLISH70 · ENG71 · ENGLISH1A · ENG070 · ENGLI70 · READ90 · ENG70 · ENGENG · ENGLISH · R90 · ENG79 · HIST7245 · 28 lifetime ratings

AI rating
18/100
RMP rating
1.8/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.9

The decision

; you will not learn English skills and risk failing the departmental portfolio.

Best fit · Self Taught ProOff-Topic PoliticsDoes Not Teach EnglishHurtful CommentsPortfolio Fail RiskWaste of Time
  • Majority say she rarely teaches English and fills class with politics and personal stories
  • Harsh or unfair outcomes are common, including portfolio failures and late work dumps
  • Students strongly advise avoiding her developmental English courses

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

32/100

Daily work can seem light, but many fail the portfolio or get dumped with late-semester work without preparation.

; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

68/100

Content load is often light and off-topic, but the lack of real teaching makes the actual English outcomes hard.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Optional

78/100

Several students say you do not even have to show up, though her own absences and lateness are also noted.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

18/100

The because you learn nothing useful and risk failing.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

28/100

Multiple reports of mass fails, unfair portfolio outcomes, and unearned grades despite light daily work.

Format shift

All evidence from in-person reviews.

Workload

Moderate

45/100

Often little homework for months, then a heavy late-semester dump tied to the .

Format shift

All evidence from in-person reviews.

Teaching experience

Awful

18/100

Consistent complaints that she teaches politics and life stories instead of English and is unprepared.

Format shift

All evidence from in-person reviews.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

30/100

Grades hinge on paragraphs, compositions, and the department portfolio more than traditional exams.

Format shift

All evidence from in-person reviews.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

28 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person English and reading classes are overwhelmingly criticized for off-topic lectures, little English instruction, mean remarks, and high fail risk on the portfolio.

Main concern

You may leave unprepared for the department portfolio and still fail despite easy day-to-day work.

What students said

“ .”
ENG70
“half of her students fail the class because they do not know what is required in the two 90 minute compositions. BEWARE AND !!!”
ENG070
“She didnt even teach us anything at all.. She's always talking about other subject then Eng. AND THE BAD PART IS THAT SHE FAIL EVERYONE IN HER CLASS!!”
ENG71

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment centers on end-of-term writing and department portfolio rather than clearly described student-friendly exams.

Portfolio CompositionsLate-Semester Work DumpLittle Formal Exam Detail

Assessment risk

Standard

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person courses emphasize portfolio compositions and last-month writing with little prior English instruction.

Portfolio CompositionsEnd-of-Semester Work Dump
“when the portfolio is due by the English Department half of her students fail the class”
ENG070
“Then a load of work the last month of the semester and counted that as english at all.”
ENG70

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ !!!!!!!”

Voice snapshots generated from 28 in-person reviews, highlighting off-topic lectures, fail risk, and . Credibility rating: High.

🚫 Recommendation Collapse

18/100

“ .”

📚 No English Teaching

18/100

“she sits there and talks all day about nothing related to english.”

💥 Hurtful Classroom Climate

20/100

“Two weeks ago she made fun of me because of my weight in front of the whole entire class!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • talks all day about nothing related to english
  • all she talks about is polotics! class is very useless!!
  • Never prepared, forgot the .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • half of her students fail the class because they do not know what is required
  • SHE FAIL EVERYONE IN HER CLASS!!
  • Gave us more life lessons that anything... Then a load of work the last month

Theme 3

💔 About Character

  • made fun of me because of my weight in front of the whole entire class
  • made alot of hurtful comments to students,such as saying they're dumb
  • Teacher made **** comments towards students

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

28

Recent reviews read by the AI

28

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

Twenty-eight reviews spanning 2004-2011 are highly consistent on off-topic teaching and .

Inside 28 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 52
3 out of 54
2 out of 56
1 out of 515

Course coverage

ENG709 reviews
ENG716 reviews
ENGLISH3 reviews
ENGLI702 reviews
ENG0701 review
Show 7 more courses
ENG791 review
ENGENG1 review
ENGLISH1A1 review
ENGLISH701 review
HIST72451 review
R901 review
READ901 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values