AI Rate Professor

Physics

Yuriko Jones

PHYSC10 · PHYS10 · PHYS4A · PHYCS4A · PHYS350 · PHYSC010 · PHYSC4A · 11 lifetime ratings

AI rating
42/100
RMP rating
3.0/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.5

The decision

if and ask for help early; results vary sharply by course.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerPolarized ReviewsTeach Yourself PhysicsHelpful When AvailableHard GraderKnows Material
  • Lower-division PHYS10 reviews often praise her knowledge and willingness to help
  • PHYS4A and and
  • content mastery is real

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

38/100

An A is possible but usually requires staying on top of hard material and .

; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

Physics content is repeatedly called tough, fast, and fire-hose paced, especially in summer and 4A.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

48/100

Some say skip lecture because you learn nothing; others .

.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

48/100

helpful for some PHYS10 students, strongly avoided for overloaded PHYS4A.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

34/100

Students report , and late work.

Format shift

All evidence from in-person reviews.

Workload

Heavy

35/100

, and the need to self-teach create a heavy load.

Format shift

All evidence from in-person reviews.

Teaching experience

Average

48/100

Knowledgeable and sometimes very clear, but .

Format shift

All evidence from in-person reviews.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Mix of , and exams with concept emphasis.

Format shift

All evidence from in-person reviews.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

11 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

and helpful in PHYS10, while PHYS4A students say lectures fail and you must teach yourself from the book.

Main concern

Lectures can feel useless under overload, so .

What students said

“It was a teach yourself situation for the whole semester and .”
PHYS4A
“Really great teacher. Knows the material solid (actually is a rocket scientist). Class is hard but she will help you.”
PHYSC10
“She grades very hard and .”
PHYS350

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams and quizzes test concepts; some feel random without .

Concept QuizzesIn-Person ExamsHomework Review Focus

Assessment risk

Standard

52/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and ; grading can feel picky.

Short QuizzesConcept-Focused ExamsPoints for Effort on Wrong Answers
“ ”
PHYS4A
“Her quizzes are short. that you understand the concept.”
PHYSC10

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“It was a teach yourself situation for the whole semester and .”

Voice snapshots generated from 11 in-person reviews, highlighting polarized teaching quality and . Credibility rating: Medium.

📚

40/100

“You dont have to go to lecture cause you will not learn anything. You have to teach yourself.”

🚀 Strong Subject Mastery

75/100

“Knows the material solid (actually is a rocket scientist).”

⚖️

34/100

“She grades very hard and .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Her lectures are difficult to comprehend.
  • Ms. and tries hard to make everyone understand.
  • All she and spends half the .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Kinda like trying to get a sip of water from a fire hose.
  • Got an A, but don't feel I came away w/ anything.

Theme 3

🤝 About Helpfulness

  • Class is hard but she will help you. All you have to do is ask.
  • This is not an easy subject but Mrs. Jones will go out of her way to help you.
  • Very helpful but a bit sometimes.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

11

Recent reviews read by the AI

11

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

Eleven reviews from 2006-2011 show a clear course split (PHYS10 vs PHYS4A/lab), with enough detail but mixed consistency.

Inside 11 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 54
4 out of 52
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 54

Course coverage

PHYS102 reviews
PHYS4A2 reviews
PHYSC0102 reviews
PHYSC102 reviews
PHYCS4A1 review
Show 2 more courses
PHYS3501 review
PHYSC4A1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values