AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Benjamin Cauchon

MATH105 · MATH80 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
52/100
RMP rating
3.8/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
4.5

The decision

if you are comfortable learning math largely on your own; teaching quality is inconsistent.

Best fit · Self Taught ProConfusing ExplanationsHelpful When ClearSelf-Study HeavyMixed TeachingHard Math
  • and learned mostly alone, another found in-class answers very helpful.
  • Course content is rated hard (difficulty 4-5) with little grade or workload detail.
  • Very old, tiny sample (2010 only) limits confidence.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

38/100

No grades or easy-A comments appear; high difficulty ratings and .

.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

Students rate difficulty high (4-5) and one needed to teach themselves the material.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews .

.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

48/100

One student valued helpful answers; another disliked the teaching style and learned little in class.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

50/100

No grade outcomes or , so leniency cannot be confirmed.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

45/100

One student did most work alone, but .

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Average

55/100

Quality swings and A, yielding a mixed classroom experience.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person math sections show split experiences: one student needed to self-teach after .

Main concern

, so success may depend on independent study.

What students said

“The and ended up doing most of the work on my own.”
MATH80
“His in class explanations and answers to student questions were very helpful.”
MATH105

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

No student .

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Reviews do .

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Great guy, didn't really like his teaching style and didn't help me learn hardly at all.”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 in-person reviews from 2010, highlighting mixed teaching clarity. Credibility rating: Low.

📚 Teaching Clarity

55/100

“The and ended up doing most of the work on my own.”

💬 Helpful Q and A

70/100

“His in class explanations and answers to student questions were very helpful.”

🧗 Course Challenge

28/100

“ended up doing most of the work on my own.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • didn't really like his teaching style and didn't help me learn hardly at all
  • The
  • His in class explanations and answers to student questions were very helpful.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Independence

  • ended up doing most of the work on my own
  • Great guy

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

28/100

Evidence confidence

Only two very old (2010) short reviews with no grades, tags, or and mixed opinions.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

MATH1051 review
MATH801 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values