AI Rate Professor

English

Alan Tufft

ENG70 · ENGLISH1A · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
22/100
RMP rating
2.2/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

Avoid if possible; students report poor lecture quality and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProScatterbrainedWastes Class TimeUnfamiliar With MaterialHard to FollowStay Away
  • Students say he cannot lecture clearly and often says uh repeatedly.
  • He is called scatterbrained, unfamiliar with material, and time-wasting.
  • Content may be easy at lower levels, but teaching quality is widely criticized.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

62/100

Lower-level English content is called easy, but As.

.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

68/100

Students say ENG70 is easy as a course level, while ENGLISH1A felt harder under weak instruction.

Difficulty comments come only from in-person reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

.

No online reviews; .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

15/100

Students call him the , and question his knowledge and focus.

All three in-person reviews are negative or lukewarm on recommendation.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

50/100

; ease comments refer more to course level than grade leniency.

Format shift

Based only on in-person reviews.

Workload

Moderate

55/100

; main issue is wasted class time rather than assignment volume.

Format shift

Based only on in-person reviews.

Teaching experience

Poor

22/100

He is criticized for incomplete sentences, scatterbrained delivery, weak material knowledge, and poor focus.

Format shift

Based only on in-person reviews.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Reviews do not clearly weight exams versus assignments, so .

Format shift

Based only on in-person reviews.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

as easy content-wise but poorly taught, with rambling lectures and weak subject command.

Main concern

Only three old negative-to-mediocre reviews with limited grade detail.

What students said

“The !!! Stay Away!!”
ENGLISH1A
“He is scatter brain, but it enjoyable at times.”
ENG70
“unfamiliar with material he is teaching.”
ENG70

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

in the reviews.

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Reviews do not clearly prove exam policy or testing format for his in-person classes.

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“The !!! Stay Away!!”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 in-person reviews, highlighting weak lecture quality and . Credibility rating: Low.

🚫 Teaching Quality

22/100

“He cannot complete a sentence without saying Uh, Uh, Uh. Not a good example for a Enlish teacher.”

🌀 Classroom Focus

25/100

“He also enjoys talking this causes a concentration problem for students while tring to do class work.”

📚 Subject Knowledge

20/100

“unfamiliar with material he is teaching. thinks hes hilarious (isn't).”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He cannot complete a sentence without saying Uh, Uh, Uh.
  • He is scatter brain
  • wastes too much time on other things.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • its an easy class because its english 70
  • The !!! Stay Away!!

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

30/100

Evidence confidence

Three short older reviews agree on weak teaching, but sample size and missing grade detail keep credibility low.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 52
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

ENG702 reviews
ENGLISH1A1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values