AI Rate Professor

Electronics

Ocean Tran

Courses not reported · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
22/100
RMP rating
1.7/5
Take again
33.33%
Difficulty
4.7

The decision

Avoid unless and tolerate pop quizzes with little guidance.

Best fit · Self Taught ProPop quizzesTeach yourselfBroken equipmentHands-off instructionHeavy self-study
  • and having to teach themselves trade skills.
  • Pop quizzes, wasted class time, and .
  • Passing is possible with attendance and homework, but many call the experience frustrating and unhelpful.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

32/100

One student earned an A, but , and self-teaching make a strong grade hard work rather than easy.

.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

22/100

High difficulty ratings and comments about teaching yourself almost everything show a steep intellectual and practical load.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

and showing up is treated as the baseline for any chance of passing.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

28/100

Only one of , and the rest call the class unhelpful and discouraging.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

28/100

Tagged as a and test-heavy pressure, even when some students still pass.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

22/100

Lots of homework, frequent pop quizzes, and .

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Poor

24/100

Reviews describe confusing prerecorded or short lectures, hands-off teaching, and little useful guidance.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

72/100

Pop quizzes and survive.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person course 77 is widely criticized for , and heavy self-teaching, with only one milder pass-focused review.

Main concern

Minimal teaching time and nonfunctional lab equipment leave students unprepared.

What students said

“ .”
77
“More time was wasted on BBQs than learning real trade skills.”
77
“as long as you show up and .”
77

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment leans strict through random pop quizzes and .

Pop quizzesTest heavyRandom quiz details

Assessment risk

Strict

30/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Students report common random pop quizzes and .

Pop quizzesTest heavyRandom quiz details
“ .”
77
“ almost everything.”
77

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ . Prerecorded lectures are confusing, disorganized, and .”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 in-person reviews, highlighting weak instruction and . Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

24/100

“Instruction lasted about 15 minutes at the start, then students were on their own while he socialized.”

⚠️ Workload Stress

22/100

“workload is excessive, guidance is minimal, and the class is frustrating, discouraging, and completely unhelpful.”

📉 Recommendation Level

28/100

“much of the completing the program.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He is a lot more hands off which has its drawbacks
  • , and
  • students must teach themselves almost everything

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • as long as you show up and
  • Beware of pop quizzes

Theme 3

🔧

  • More time was wasted on BBQs than learning real trade skills
  • much of the
  • The main focus seemed to be staying under budget

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

48/100

Evidence confidence

Three detailed recent reviews show consistent negativity, but the small sample still limits certainty.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 52

Course coverage

773 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

1

C+ 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1