AI Rate Professor

History

Hans Hauselmann

HIST101 · HIS106 · HIST104 · HIST107 · HIST105 · HIST17A · HIS102 · HIS101 · 80 lifetime ratings

AI rating
36/100
RMP rating
2.9/5
Take again
39.39%
Difficulty
3.4

The decision

; if you love history and can handle a very heavy weekly load.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerHeavy Reading LoadTough GraderPassionate LecturerBusywork HeavyAI Content Complaints
  • , and tight deadlines overwhelm many students.
  • Some students love the lectures and passion, but , and support weak.
  • Recent reviews also criticize AI-generated materials and unreliable course websites.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

34/100

Even , and a heavy grind for B or A range grades.

Both formats demand heavy work for grades; and strict deadlines.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

Content itself is not always advanced, but volume of , and notes makes the course feel very hard.

Online difficulty is mainly volume; and test mismatch.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

48/100

as optional, others mandatory, and participation or notebook checks can still matter.

Online ; in-person policies vary by section.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

38/100

Take-again is low and many students say the .

Online has more mixed manageability comments; .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

28/100

and comments about never getting full credit or harsh essay scoring are common.

Format shift

Both formats report strict grading; in-person complaints are especially frequent.

Workload

Overwhelming

16/100

Students repeatedly describe astronomical reading, multiple essays, weekly annotations, and tight deadlines.

Format shift

Online and in-person both report very heavy weekly work.

Teaching experience

Average

42/100

Passionate lectures help some learners, but , and AI-heavy materials drag overall quality down.

Format shift

and stronger AI or organization complaints; online is more about volume and engagement.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

32/100

Reading responses, essays, notebook checks, discussions, and .

Format shift

Online is reading and discussion heavy; in-person adds notebook checks and frequent papers.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

32 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews praise engaging lectures for some students but more often warn , and recent AI-heavy course design.

Main concern

, and uneven support or organization.

What students said

“The was the ! DO NOT and !”
HIS102
“I really enjoyed the lectures by professor Hauselmann and will miss his class.”
HIS101
“The amount of work assigned is completely outrageous!”
HIS101

Remote format

Online

18 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

Online sections are reading-and-assignment heavy with long weekly work; and doable, many find them time-consuming and .

Main concern

Huge reading and writing load with limited flexibility and .

What students said

“ , but extremely time consuming so if you're taking a lot of other difficult .”
HIS101
“Get ready for about 2+ hours of reading and about 2+ more for .”
HIST101
“there were hundreds of pages to read each week, and they weren't even useful.”
HIST104

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams exist and can feel mismatched or tough, but the and writing work.

Study GuidesEssay HeavyNotebook ChecksReading Based

Assessment risk

Standard

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and exams that some say do not match lectures.

Notebook ChecksEssaysStudy GuidesStrict Deadlines
“ ”
HIS101
“ and you do read a lot online but he provides it for you.”
HIST101

Online

Online assessment centers on weekly readings, annotations, discussions, and .

Weekly ReadingsDiscussion PostsTime-Consuming Homework
“ , but extremely time consuming”
HIS101
“A lot of and annotate with little time to do so”
HIST101

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“The amount of work assigned is completely outrageous!”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting workload, grading, and lecture passion. Credibility rating: High.

📚 Workload Overload

16/100

“his course and .”

🎯 Teaching Quality

42/100

“I really enjoyed the lectures by professor Hauselmann and will miss his class.”

⚖️

28/100

“even if you perfectly follow the rubric, you will never received a 100% on an assignment.”

🤖 AI Course Design

30/100

“Rather than teaching or AI do it for him.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He's got a strong passion for the subject
  • His lectures are poorly AI-generated
  • He's a good lecturer but there are a lot of

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • Definitely a
  • if you're taking for gen-ed id find someone else
  • .

Theme 3

⏰ About Deadlines and Support

  • assignments are due precisely at 6 pm
  • Does not answer emails though.
  • He is 3 weeks behind on grading coursework.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

80

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

50 recent and older reviews are detailed and highly consistent on workload and .

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 519
4 out of 516
3 out of 59
2 out of 512
1 out of 525

Course coverage

HIS10114 reviews
HIST10114 reviews
HIST1048 reviews
HIS1025 reviews
HIST1053 reviews
Show 3 more courses
HIST1073 reviews
His1062 reviews
HIST17A1 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

45 reported outcomes

A range

13

A+ 2 · A 7 · A- 4

B range

15

B+ 4 · B 9 · B- 2

C range

5

C+ 3 · C 2

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

12

Drop/Withdrawal 3 · Incomplete 4 · Not sure yet 4 · Rather not say 1