AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Rodolfo Andrade

MATH112 · MMATH161 · MATH101 · STATS134 · MATH171 · MATH193 · MATH134 · MATH172 · MATH173 · 169 lifetime ratings

AI rating
16/100
RMP rating
2.0/5
Take again
18.25%
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

Avoid if you have any other option; students consistently call this a high-stress, low-support math experience.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerHarsh Point DeductionConfusing LecturesHigh Drop RateTest MismatchRude Classroom Tone
  • , and other math courses.
  • as picky and punitive for tiny formatting or notation errors.
  • Many report poor teaching, unhelpful office hours, and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

14/100

Even strong students report grades collapsing over tiny errors and .

; nearly all evidence is from in-person courses.

Is the course easy?

BrainBurner

18/100

Content plus his teaching and than peers expect.

In-person calculus and stats reviews dominate this difficulty signal.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

12/100

as mandatory and missing class is treated as costly.

Online and .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

15/100

and comments overwhelmingly urge students to choose anyone else.

Avoidance is strongest in person, with the few online reviews agreeing.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

12/100

Students say he zeros or heavily docks entire problems for minor notation or formatting slips.

Format shift

detail in person.

Workload

Overwhelming

16/100

as excessive and often poorly aligned with exams.

Format shift

In-person stats and calc students most often cite 30-plus hour weeks and .

Teaching experience

Awful

18/100

Most reviewers say he cannot explain material clearly, deflects questions, and creates a hostile classroom tone.

Format shift

record; online notes similar unhelpfulness.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

78/100

Exams and quizzes carry high stakes and often feel harder or different from assigned practice.

Format shift

Test-heavy tags and .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

44 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews form a strong consensus of , and frequent classwide failure or drops.

Main concern

and weak classroom support drive high stress and .

What students said

“ .more than half of the class dropped out”
MATH134
“He took off 5 points from my exam because I forgot to put arrows on the end of my x and y plane”
MATH193
“ .”
MATH172

Remote format

Online

6 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

Limited online reviews still , and drops.

Main concern

and unhelpful support leave little room for recovery online.

What students said

“Honestly the .”
STATS134
“ for.”
MATH101
“I dropped his class and glad I did.”
MATH134

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are high-stakes, time-pressured, and graded for tiny presentation errors.

Test HeavyPicky NotationPop QuizzesExam Mismatch

Assessment risk

Strict

22/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

to prepare for, and often unfinished by most of the class.

Picky NotationToo Many QuestionsPop QuizzesVague Exam Prep
“He took off 5 points from my exam because I forgot to put arrows on the end of my x and y plane”
MATH193
“the given. Most of the class don't finish the exams.”
MATH172

Online

and unforgiving grading with no student-friendly exam policy proven.

Test HeavyTough Grading
“ for.”
MATH101
“ HIM, THEY ARE ALL 100% TRUE.”
MATH134

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ .more than half of the class dropped out,he assigns an excessive amount of .”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews with highly , and support. Credibility rating: High.

🚫

15/100

“Save yourself the stress and time!!”

📉

12/100

“ .”

😵 Teaching Quality

18/100

“Tons of , and blatant lack of teaching skills”

🧪

22/100

“Most of the class don't finish the exams.”

Theme 1

⚠️ About Grades And Drops

  • more than half of the class dropped out
  • Me and my classmates would talk all the time about our grades and how we were all failing
  • half the class dropped

Theme 2

📐 About Teaching

  • he just cannot teach
  • you practically have to teach yourself the material

Theme 3

💢 About Classroom Tone

  • Rudest professor
  • Wants to see you fail
  • incredibly rude and passive aggressive

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

169

Lifetime ratings

90/100

Evidence confidence

Fifty recent, highly consistent negative reviews across many math courses form a strong and detailed pattern.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 526
4 out of 514
3 out of 59
2 out of 518
1 out of 5102

Course coverage

MATH13410 reviews
MATH17210 reviews
MATH1718 reviews
MATH1938 reviews
STATS1345 reviews
Show 4 more courses
MATH1734 reviews
MATH1012 reviews
MATH1122 reviews
MMATH1611 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

48 reported outcomes

A range

10

A+ 2 · A 7 · A- 1

B range

9

B+ 1 · B 6 · B- 2

C range

10

C+ 1 · C 9

D range

4

D+ 2 · D 1 · D- 1

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

14

Drop/Withdrawal 7 · Not sure yet 5 · Rather not say 2