AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Jennifer Long

MATH106 · MMATH0474 · MMATH134 · MATH101 · STATS134 · MATH138 · MATH134 · MATH89 · 28 lifetime ratings

AI rating
62/100
RMP rating
3.6/5
Take again
60.71%
Difficulty
3.7

The decision

if you can put serious weekly hours into math and will use packets, tutoring, and .

Best fit · Effort For RewardOpen-note testsHomework heavyExtra credit availablePolarizing math stylePacket-based notes
  • Open notes and help, but exams and weekly work still feel hard
  • Students split between loving her organization and calling her tough or abrupt
  • Workload is high, especially online stats with long videos, labs, and

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

42/100

As are earned only with , and ; exams still hit hard.

In-person open notes help more; and heavier weekly volume.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

32/100

Stats and finite math content plus fast assumptions about prior knowledge make the course intellectually demanding.

Both formats are hard; online adds long videos and sequential assignment locks.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

45/100

and warn missing lectures leaves you lost, though a few report more flexibility.

; online is more self-paced but .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

58/100

; fans praise care and structure while critics cite workload, tone, and .

; online reviews are more negative.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

40/100

Open notes and partial-try homework help, but many still call her a .

Format shift

Online students more often say automatic low grades for format issues; .

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Packets, Pearson or lab work, quizzes, and long videos create a large weekly load for most sections.

Format shift

Online workload complaints are strongest; and papers or packets.

Teaching experience

Average

64/100

Many praise clear packets, humor, and real care for success, while others .

Format shift

In-person fans dominate positive teaching stories; and clarity is weaker.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

72/100

Tests heavily shape the grade, with homework and quizzes supporting but .

Format shift

True in both formats; .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

21 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person students get thorough packets, open-note tests, group activities, and more direct help, but and lots of homework.

Main concern

and her tone can feel sharp when students ask for clarification.

What students said

“ . There is a lot of homework and you need to stay caught up and go to the tutoring center for assistance.”
STATS134
“Teaches material as if we have taken Calc before and understand terms. Gets upset when students ask for clarification.”
MATH138

Remote format

Online

7 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

Online math is demanding, with long , and high-stakes Zoom or timed tests.

Main concern

Time commitment and or multi-class schedules.

What students said

“If you can't handle 40 pages of for you.”
MMATH134
“This is a and .”
MATH134

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

, but questions remain hard and time-consuming.

Open notes commonCheat sheets allowedExtra creditIn-person or Zoom testsHomework supports exams

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

70/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

cheat sheets and heavy reliance on packet study.

Open notesFull page front and back for examsTwo pages for finalPacket-based prep
“ .”
STATS134
“She gives you an entire page front and back for exams and 2 for the Final.”
math106

Online

exams; notes help only if packets are complete and organized.

Zoom tests reportedLong multi-page examsOpen notes when packets are thoroughExtra credit small
“ and can be 7 full pages in 2 hours.”
MMATH134
“the weekly .”
MATH134

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If you have to take a math class and .”

Voice snapshots generated from 28 reviews, highlighting open-note exams, heavy workload, and polarized teaching tone. Credibility rating: High.

📝 Open-Note Help

70/100

“The easier.”

🏋️ Heavy Workload

28/100

“If you can't handle 40 pages of for you.”

❤️ Care for Success

75/100

“She truly wants you to succeed and is willing to do anything in her power that she can to help you.”

⚠️ Polarizing Tone

35/100

“Gets upset when students ask for clarification.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She gets right to the material and the and thorough
  • The , even if you are bad at math, to comprehend
  • She proves packets for each chapter, where we fill in

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • The so make really good notes
  • She offers to help out, and cheat sheets for

Theme 3

⚠️ About Online Load

  • if you're going part-time

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

28

Recent reviews read by the AI

28

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

Twenty-eight detailed reviews show a stable split between devoted fans and workload-or-tone critics across several math courses.

Inside 28 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 513
4 out of 54
3 out of 51
2 out of 57
1 out of 53

Course coverage

MATH13412 reviews
MMATH1346 reviews
MATH1014 reviews
STATS1342 reviews
math1061 review
Show 3 more courses
MATH1381 review
MATH891 review
MMATH04741 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

26 reported outcomes

A range

15

A+ 2 · A 10 · A- 3

B range

5

B+ 1 · B 1 · B- 3

C range

5

C+ 1 · C 4

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Drop/Withdrawal 1