AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Elda Bautista

MMATH70 · STATS134 · MATH70 · STATS1610 · MATH134 · MMATH29 · MATH89 · 57 lifetime ratings

AI rating
54/100
RMP rating
3.1/5
Take again
58.14%
Difficulty
3.7

The decision

Take her if you will attend, use support classes, and ; skip if .

Best fit · Effort For RewardStandards-Based RetakesTest HeavyAccent PolarizingFunny and DirectHomework Plus Exams
  • and late reopened work help dedicated students pass.
  • and can feel harsh or time-crunched.
  • Accent and fast pacing split the class between fans and frustrated students.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

54/100

Retakes and reopened homework help, but an A.

In-person evidence dominates; the few .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

36/100

Stats and developmental math feel hard mainly because of pace, calculator skills, and cumulative section mastery.

Both formats call content tough; .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

24/100

and often tied to or not falling behind.

In-person is clearly attendance-heavy; .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

56/100

Roughly half the class loves the support systems while the other half cannot handle pace or accent.

Most evidence is in-person; online is too thin to shift the overall split.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

52/100

and reopened work are student-friendly, but mastery standards and .

Format shift

; online includes one tough-grader camera-exam complaint.

Workload

Heavy

29/100

Multiple weekly homework sets plus study for .

Format shift

; online still reports long lectures and topic assignments.

Teaching experience

Average

55/100

She is funny and supportive for many, yet accent, speed, and uneven question-handling drag scores down.

Format shift

In-person reviews are highly polarized; the few online comments are milder but still mixed.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

78/100

Exams or section-mastery tests usually dominate around 60-70 percent of the grade.

Format shift

Both formats emphasize test weight; .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

47 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person stats and algebra reviews are polarized: many call her caring and fair with , and .

Main concern

Fast lectures plus high-stakes section mastery tests punish students who fall behind.

What students said

“tests are 70% of your grade!!! %.”
MATH134
“If you miss questions on exams you can try again on each exam until the end of the semester”
STATS1610
“ so fast and a-lot of the time she doesn't answer questions.”
STATS134

Remote format

Online

3 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

some praise funny and .

Main concern

and hard mastery judgments on few questions.

What students said

“You and your workspace need to be on camera, but .”
MATH134
“Exams are worth 70% of your overall grade and each exam only has 5 or 6 questions each.”
MATH134
“ prepare for exams.”
STATS134

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are high-stakes and time-sensitive, softened by .

Section Mastery RetakesHigh Exam WeightIn-Person Midterms/FinalsWebcam Workspace (online)Study Guides

Assessment risk

Standard

46/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and finals use section mastery, short timed tests, study guides, and .

Section MasteryRetakes Until FinalStudy GuidesTimed Tests
“ %. its a pass/not pass a section.”
MATH134
“If you miss questions on the last day of class.”
STATS1610
“ but midterms and .”
MATH134

Online

Online and heavy exam weighting.

Camera RequiredTopic RetakesFew Questions High Stakes
“You and your workspace need to be on camera, but .”
MATH134
“each exam only has 5 or 6 questions each. She is a .”
MATH134

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If you put in the effort, you'll get the A.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 mostly in-person math and stats reviews with strong polarization. Credibility rating: High.

🔁

62/100

“If you miss questions on exams you can try again on each exam until the end of the semester”

🧪

78/100

“tests are 70% of your grade!!!”

🗣️ Accent and Pace Split

40/100

“ and funny. Hard to understand, she goes too fast.”

😄 Class Energy

70/100

“She's sassy, makes class fun, and grades fairly.”

👎 Polarized Recommendation

56/100

“ so fast and a-lot of the time she doesn't answer questions.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She makes class enjoyable and checks for .
  • she is not fond of doing so
  • She does everything step by step!

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • .
  • but they get easier every time.
  • Too much HW that only counts for 20% of the grade and exams worth 70% of the grade.

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • and .
  • Very kind and respectful off the jump.
  • Shes also super rude sometimes.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

57

Lifetime ratings

90/100

Evidence confidence

50 reviews over a decade with large in-person sample and , and .

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 519
4 out of 59
3 out of 55
2 out of 511
1 out of 513

Course coverage

MATH13418 reviews
MATH7015 reviews
STATS16107 reviews
STATS1345 reviews
MATH893 reviews
Show 2 more courses
MMATH291 review
MMATH701 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

44 reported outcomes

A range

21

A+ 1 · A 20

B range

9

B+ 3 · B 6

C range

6

C+ 1 · C 4 · C- 1

D range

2

D+ 1 · D 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

6

Drop/Withdrawal 2 · Incomplete 1 · Not sure yet 3