AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Angelica Cortes

MATH106 · MMATH106 · M134 · MMATH134 · MATH105 · STATS134 · MATH0325 · MATH171 · MATH134 · 69 lifetime ratings

AI rating
28/100
RMP rating
2.7/5
Take again
37.68%
Difficulty
3.8

The decision

Avoid unless you already learn math independently and can handle a crushing weekly workload.

Best fit · Self Taught ProDoes not teachPeer teaching groupsHeavy homeworkTough graderSassy attitude
  • Many students say she refuses to teach and forces peer groups instead of direct instruction
  • and
  • a minority who grind 15-25 hours a week pass and defend her structure

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

32/100

Passing is possible with huge effort and multiple quiz attempts, but As are hard and .

Some online MATH105 students call it an easy A if self-taught; higher-level math is much harder.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

Stats and math content plus fast pace and self-teaching make the course feel very hard for most.

Difficulty is high in both formats; workload is the bigger pain online.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

Attendance and participation are repeatedly required, and .

Both online Zoom and as required.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

30/100

and the dominant message is to pick another professor.

Negativity is strong in both formats, with a small pro-Cortes minority online and in person.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

25/100

; students report nitpicky scoring, notebooks graded rigidly, and exams harder than practice.

Format shift

; three quiz attempts slightly soften online modules.

Workload

Overwhelming

12/100

Students report 10+ assignments weekly, 15-25 hours of work, and constant quizzes and labs.

Format shift

Online workload is especially relentless with multiple due dates each week.

Teaching experience

Poor

28/100

Most say she does not teach, is rude or sassy, and sends students to figure it out in groups.

Format shift

Both formats criticize peer-only teaching; a if you rewatch them.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

72/100

Exams and and homework as secondary pieces.

Format shift

; some finals are on campus.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

29 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

, and an unfriendly attitude, with a few defenders who say videos and effort work.

Main concern

Students report no help in class or office hours and a disrespectful classroom tone.

What students said

“This is the time at MJC.”
MATH106
“The professor expects students to teach the curriculum to each other, she refuses help”
MATH171
“she is amazing at teaching you the material and gives ”
MATH134

Remote format

Online

21 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online sections use modules, recorded videos, breakout rooms, and ; midterms or .

Main concern

No live teaching, rude tone, and 10+ assignments due multiple times a week.

What students said

“The . ... Never teaches. Annoyed by any question.”
MATH106
“There is about 10 assignments due every 3 days”
STATS134
“ so plan accordingly if u expected to be fully online.”
STATS134

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

and ; some online students must still test on campus.

Test heavyWeekly quizzesOn-campus exams for some onlineOpen notes mentioned onceThree quiz attempts

Assessment risk

Strict

35/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and finals worth a large share of the grade.

Test heavyHarder exams than classworkFinal high weight
“Final is worth 25% of your grade.”
MATH106
“The , and she always makes them harder than any in-class work”
MATH171

Online

Online reviews report heavy testing, three quiz attempts, and occasional on-campus midterms or finals; one notes open-note tests.

Three quiz attemptsTest heavyOn-campus examOpen notes
“ so plan accordingly if u expected to be fully online.”
STATS134
“ . Lowest score on an .”
STATS134
“you do get .”
STATS134

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“For your own good. Stay. Away. From. This. Professor.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting peer teaching, heavy work, and low recommendation. Credibility rating: High.

🚫 Teaching Disaster

28/100

“she does not teach at all. On zoom, all she would do is put us into groups so we could work on problems”

📚 Overwhelming Workload

12/100

“Be prepared for alot of . and ”

👎

30/100

“Save yourself and .”

⚖️

25/100

“ . So sassy. Never teaches.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Does not like to teach
  • students must teach eachother
  • You learn everything from yourself or piers

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • Insane amount of hw

Theme 3

😤 About Attitude

  • Very rude
  • passive aggressive and tactless
  • Talks down to everyone

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

69

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

50 recent and older reviews across online and about teaching and workload.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 514
4 out of 514
3 out of 56
2 out of 56
1 out of 529

Course coverage

MATH13421 reviews
MATH1069 reviews
STATS1346 reviews
MATH1055 reviews
MATH1714 reviews
Show 4 more courses
MMATH1342 reviews
M1341 review
MATH03251 review
MMATH1061 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

46 reported outcomes

A range

12

A+ 1 · A 10 · A- 1

B range

17

B+ 7 · B 9 · B- 1

C range

7

C+ 1 · C 5 · C- 1

D range

1

D+ 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

9

Drop/Withdrawal 3 · Not sure yet 5 · Rather not say 1