AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Angela Pignotti

MMATH112 · MATH161 · STATS134 · MATH90 · MMATH111 · MATH171 · MATH134 · 100 lifetime ratings

AI rating
22/100
RMP rating
2.4/5
Take again
23.81%
Difficulty
4.1

The decision

Avoid if ; only consider her if and can survive a test-heavy class.

Best fit · Self Taught ProTeach YourselfConfusing LecturesTest HeavyHigh Fail RiskTough Grader
  • Most students say lectures confuse more than they teach and .
  • Exams dominate grades and .
  • A minority of statistics students praise her availability, but .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

Some Bs and As appear, but many Fs, incompletes, and under tough tests.

Online and and frequent failure risk.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

26/100

Students repeatedly describe long lectures, dense packets, and concepts they must relearn from YouTube or ALEKS.

A few STATS134 students find it manageable; most MATH and calc reviews call it very hard.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

16/100

and several reviews warn that skipping means you will not pass.

and in-person sections.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

24/100

Roughly one in ; the dominant if better options exist.

In-person and online both trend negative, with only scattered strong recommendations.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

24/100

Tough grader tags dominate and rescue credit.

Format shift

; a few stats students mention notecards or equation sheets.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Lots of , and weekly quizzes stack on top of test prep.

Format shift

and in person.

Teaching experience

Poor

28/100

getting lost in examples, skipping hard parts, and forcing self-teaching.

Format shift

In-person volume of poor teaching complaints is larger; online has a .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

78/100

Exams matter most; homework and notes support practice but .

Format shift

Test-heavy structure is consistent online and in person.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

43 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person math is widely described as , and exams that decide the grade.

Main concern

Many students feel belittled in office hours and still have to teach themselves the material.

What students said

“ so basically be ready to be your own professor.”
MATH134
“When trying to ask for her help or asking questions she makes you feel dumb and belittles you.”
MATH134

Remote format

Online

7 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

, and failed or dropped students, with a few praise outliers.

Main concern

Students report teaching themselves while tests and .

What students said

“ properly, she gets lost then moves onto another problem. Didn't learn anything from her, had to ”
MATH171
“Barely lectures, you need to teach yourself. You will be stressing if .”
MATH134

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are high stakes and often feel harder or , though a few courses allow notecards or equation sheets.

Test HeavyStudy Guides MismatchNotecard Sometimes AllowedOnline Quizzes

Assessment risk

Strict

32/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and often mismatch study guides, with occasional notecard help in stats.

Test HeavyStudy Guides Mismatch3x5 Notecard Sometimes
“half the time the and exams, which the exams matter a lot for your grade.”
MATH134
“ , but she allows 3x5 cards and gives equation sheets.”
STATS134

Online

and self-teaching; proctoring tools are not clearly documented.

Test HeavyHard Exams
“More than half of the class failed her tests.”
MATH171

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“basically be ready to be your own professor.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 math reviews (7 online, 43 in , and low recommendation. Credibility rating: High.

🚫 Recommendation Risk

24/100

“ !”

🧠 Self-Teaching Required

28/100

“I taught myself calc from YT videos.”

📉

78/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • so basically be ready to be your own professor.
  • she would get confused trying to work through her own notes
  • lectures where really long and most of the time i had to

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • More than half of the class failed her tests.
  • Youll never be able to pass it with A or B

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • She's nice but a god awful teacher.
  • she makes you feel dumb and belittles you
  • .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

100

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

Fifty multi-year math reviews with highly consistent complaints about teaching clarity and .

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 521
4 out of 57
3 out of 512
2 out of 514
1 out of 546

Course coverage

MATH13421 reviews
MATH1719 reviews
MATH907 reviews
MMATH1124 reviews
MATH1613 reviews
Show 3 more courses
STATS1343 reviews
1342 reviews
mmath1111 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

39 reported outcomes

A range

6

A 5 · A- 1

B range

11

B+ 6 · B 5

C range

5

C+ 3 · C 2

D range

0

No reported values

F

3

F 3

No letter grade reported

14

Drop/Withdrawal 6 · Incomplete 3 · Not sure yet 3 · Rather not say 2