AI Rate Professor

Chemistry

Linda Brzezinski

CHEM142 · MCHEM1019316 · CHEM9316 · MCHEM142 · CHEM143 · CHEM112 · CHEM101 · CHEM9317 · CHEM150 · 26 lifetime ratings

AI rating
54/100
RMP rating
3.5/5
Take again
52%
Difficulty
3.6

The decision

Take her if and stay on top of frequent exams; otherwise expect uneven clarity and a .

Best fit · Effort For RewardTest Heavy ChemistryHit-or-Miss ClarityCaring When ConnectedSelf-Teach RiskPractice Sheets Help
  • Many students call her amazing and approachable while others say lectures rush and force self-teaching
  • Exams come often and drive the grade; practice sheets and notecards help when used
  • Online and pandemic transitions drew the

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

52/100

Practice and attendance can earn solid grades, but weekly or and .

and B outcomes; online pandemic terms felt harsher.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

36/100

Chemistry is math heavy and paced quickly, so many students feel they must relearn outside class.

Both formats call content hard; .

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

46/100

, but , and participation make showing up important.

; online attendance rules vary.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

52/100

; love-or-leave split depends on whether her style clicks and .

In-person recommendation is higher; online and COVID-era reviews pull it down.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

52/100

Some call assignments forgiving with notecards and practice; and little curving.

Format shift

In-person fairer when aligned; .

Workload

Moderate

44/100

Homework and practice sheets are steady, with frequent exams adding pressure rather than endless busywork alone.

Format shift

Some online sections report 6-10 weekly assignments; in-person load is more moderate.

Teaching experience

Average

55/100

and available, weak when rushed, scatterbrained, or poorly adapted online.

Format shift

; online quality is less reliable.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

82/100

Weekly or biweekly exams, lab exams, and .

Format shift

Both formats are test heavy; some allow a 3x5 notecard.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

21 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

, and fair exams aligned to practice, but several still report rushed lectures and self-teaching.

Main concern

Rushed or scatterbrained lectures that leave gaps you must fill alone.

What students said

“Probably one of the . .”
CHEM112
“If you do what is assigned and practice the .”
CHEM142
“if you have the ability to self teach, you'll do great, but otherwise her teaching style is often rushed”
MCHEM142

Remote format

Online

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

some found her accessible with lectures, and poor remote labs.

Main concern

Remote teaching quality and .

What students said

“she made me love chemistry. She is so accessible and .”
CHEM101
“avoid if you can”
CHEM142
“Nice, but not a good teacher. ; .”
MCHEM142

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are frequent and demanding but often match covered material if you use practice and notecards.

Frequent ExamsNotecard AllowedPractice SheetsCumulative FinalLecture-Aligned When Prepared

Assessment risk

Standard

52/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

notes and practice if you keep up; finals are cumulative.

Exams Every 1-2 WeeksReflective of MaterialCumulative FinalLab Exams
“the .”
CHEM142
“5 Exams 100 points one after another every 2 weeks.”
CHEM142

Online

Online exams are frequent; , but support after poor scores can feel cold.

Weekly Exams3x5 NotecardStudy HandoutsLittle Curving
“She tells you what will be on the weekly exams so you can prepare your 3x5 notecard”
CHEM101
“The whole class failed a test and her suggestion was that we need to change our study habits & she .”
CHEM142

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If !”

Voice snapshots generated from 26 reviews (5 online, 21 in , and format risk. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

55/100

“ so well and .”

📉 Clarity Risk

40/100

“Shes nice but there are and .”

🧪

52/100

“ .”

👍

52/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She clearly loves teaching and loves Chemistry.
  • You will have to teach yourself a lot.
  • Skims through the lecture as if we know everything.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • If you do what is assigned and practice the .
  • grading system not great you need 900 its for an A.
  • I failed chemistry two times before taking her and getting an A!

Theme 3

💻 About Online Experience

  • She's a nice person but at all
  • Not empathetic at all towards students and switching to online learning.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

26

Recent reviews read by the AI

26

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

26 reviews over multiple years with recurring themes of , and format differences.

Inside 26 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 512
4 out of 53
3 out of 52
2 out of 55
1 out of 54

Course coverage

CHEM14310 reviews
CHEM1424 reviews
CHEM1013 reviews
CHEM1122 reviews
CHEM93162 reviews
Show 4 more courses
MCHEM1422 reviews
CHEM1501 review
CHEM93171 review
MCHEM10193161 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

21 reported outcomes

A range

9

A+ 3 · A 6

B range

6

B+ 1 · B 4 · B- 1

C range

2

C+ 1 · C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

4

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Not sure yet 2 · Rather not say 1