AI Rate Professor

Psychology

Daniel Baker

Courses not reported · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
36/100
RMP rating
2.5/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
3.5

The decision

Evidence is too thin and split to trust; proceed only if you can handle heavy short-deadline work and an extra paid site.

Best fit · Self Taught ProPolarized ReviewsHeavy AssignmentsPaid Online AccessHarsh GradingGood Online Feedback
  • Only two reviews exist and they strongly disagree by format.
  • and earned an A with moderate time cost.
  • In-person review calls the class overloaded, expensive, boring, and harshly graded.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

52/100

The online A with solid feedback suggests a fair path, but the and crushing assignment volume.

Online evidence is more grade-friendly; .

Is the course easy?

Standard

45/100

Online called it not too difficult but time consuming; and reading as heavy.

Online difficulty rated moderate; and reading.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

70/100

Online attendance was not mandatory; .

Online review explicitly said attendance was not mandatory; .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

50/100

one enthusiastic online yes and one firm in-person no.

; .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

40/100

Online tags praise clear criteria and feedback, while .

Format shift

Online is more positive on feedback; .

Workload

Heavy

25/100

Both formats mention meaningful time cost; and short deadlines.

Format shift

online time-consuming note.

Teaching experience

Average

45/100

One student felt respected and learned a lot; the other found him boring and one of the worst.

Format shift

Online teaching experience is positive; in-person is strongly negative.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

28/100

Comments center on assignments, papers, reading, and .

Format shift

Neither review details exams; both emphasize assignment load.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

One in-person student called him among the paid website, boring delivery, and harsh grading.

Main concern

Overload of and .

What students said

“This professor is one of the . and short amounts of time.”
8211

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

One recent online student enjoyed the class, found it manageable with , and would take it again despite an $80 online textbook.

Main concern

and paid online textbook cost.

What students said

“This class wasn't too difficult, was a little time consuming but I learned a lot. The only thing is you have to spend $80 for an online textbook.”
1918

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not .

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

.

Online

Online .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“This professor is one of the . and short amounts of time.”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 reviews, highlighting a . Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

45/100

“I really enjoyed this online class.”

📚 Workload Reality

25/100

“ and short amounts of time.”

💰 Cost Concern

40/100

“you have to spend $80 for an online textbook.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • .
  • super boring I'm glad I don't have to do zoom classes with this course.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • This class wasn't too difficult, was a little time consuming but I learned a lot.
  • so be aware.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

28/100

Evidence confidence

Only two reviews from different formats with opposite conclusions and .

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

19181 review
82111 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values