June Newman

MPSYCH101 · PSYCHOLOGY101 · PSYCH101 · PSYCH102 · 26 lifetime ratings

AI rating: 34/100
RMP rating: 2.9/5
Take again: 42.31%
Difficulty: 3.4

The decision

Avoid her online psych sections if you need teaching support; only risk in person if and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProUnresponsive onlineSelf-taught heavyTough graderPolarizingExpensive textbooks

Online sections are widely panned for , and self-teaching with costly materials.
and study guides; others call lectures dull and unhelpful.
Grades can still be solid if and exams, but support and communication are inconsistent.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

56/100

Many students still earn As or A-minuses with and exam study, but tough-grader tags and .

Online reviews stress stress and self-teaching despite some As; if you study and attend.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Content is intro psych level but , and group work raise the challenge beyond pure beginner ease.

Online feels harder due to and SPSS; in-person difficulty ratings are often moderate with .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

28/100

Multiple in-person and some online comments mark attendance mandatory or warn that skipping costs participation and .

; online mixed and often not required.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

40/100

About two in five would take again; warnings.

Online ; in-person recommendations are higher but still split.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

42/100

Clear criteria appear in some sections, yet tough-grader tags and .

Format shift

Online feels harsher and less responsive; and dropped exams.

Workload

Heavy

34/100

Heavy reading, , and multiple exams stack into a heavy load.

Format shift

Online workload complaints are louder; , and group projects.

Teaching experience

Poor

38/100

Students praise character in places but repeatedly criticize online, unhelpful emails, and .

Format shift

Online teaching quality is near floor; .

Assessment method

Balanced

52/100

Mix of chapter quizzes, major , and group projects or presentations.

Format shift

Online leans assignments and group work; and projects.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

17 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person and complaints of PowerPoint lectures, tough grading, and mandatory attendance.

Main concern

and ; support can feel limited.

What students said

“This class is an easy A if you study, show up to class and read the material”
MPSYCH101

“She lectures like you know exactly what she is talking about and if you ask questions she treats you like you are stupid”
PSYCH102

“Cool professor I took this class a while back. Definitely learned alot and ”
PSYCH101

Remote format

Online

9 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online psych is described as , heavy self-reading, unhelpful emails, costly books or codes, and .

Main concern

Zero teaching support, rude or , and expensive required materials.

What students said

“ respond imagine sending 30+ emails and getting nothing”
PSYCH101

“We received and had no choice but to teach ourselves from the ”
PSYCH102

“There are and we had to teach ourselves”
MPSYCH101

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams and and occasional dropped exams; no strong proctoring claims appear.

Study guidesDropped exam optionChapter quizzesPowerPoint-aligned tests

Assessment risk

Standard

52/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

; one review notes four major exams with the last dropped.

Study guidesDropped final exam optionLecture and textbook overlap varies

“overall the class was easy, there's 4 major exams but ”
PSYCH101

“She gives a thorough study guide so if you find the answers for it you will pass the tests easily”
MPSYCH101

Online

Reviews stress reading-based quizzes and .

Reading-based quizzesSelf-taught exam prep

“I feel as though she did not teach at all and ”
PSYCH101

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice
“ respond imagine sending 30+ emails and getting nothing. HEAVY ON SPSS LABS and if you don't understand it you're screwed”
Voice snapshots generated from 26 reviews (9 online, 17 in person), highlighting format-split teaching quality and . Credibility rating: High.

📉 Online Teaching Collapse

20/100

“We received and had no choice but to teach ourselves from the ”

📧 Unresponsive Communication

25/100

“she does NOT respond imagine sending 30+ emails and getting nothing”

📚 Effort-for-Grade Reality

56/100

“This class is an easy A if you study, show up to class and read the material”

⚖️ Polarized Reputation

40/100

“Despite professor Newman being a great person, I do not think her teaching ability matches her character”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

There are and we had to teach ourselves
She lectures like you know exactly what she is talking about
Cool professor... She's great at teaching and I had no issues

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

This class is an easy A if you study, show up to class and read the material
if you study for the
and if you don't understand it you're screwed

Theme 3

💬 About Communication and Support

imagine sending 30+ emails and getting nothing
when we attempted to ask for help we were met with the absolute bare minimum
She's incredibly rude and condescending

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

Recent reviews read by the AI

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

26 detailed reviews span 2016-2026 with consistent online negatives and and pattern reliability.

Inside 26 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 58

4 out of 54

3 out of 50

2 out of 54

1 out of 510

Course coverage

PSYCH10210 reviews

PSYCH1019 reviews

MPSYCH1016 reviews

PSYCHOLOGY1011 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

18 reported outcomes

A range

A+ 3 · A 5 · A- 3

B range

B+ 2 · B 4

C range

C- 1

D range

No reported values

F

No reported values

No letter grade reported

No reported values

June Newman

Avoid her online psych sections if you need teaching support; only risk in person if x x x and x x x x.

Four answers before you build your schedule.

FairEffort

Standard

Mandatory

Depends

See how this professor fits your week.

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

In person

Online

See what students actually said.

📉 Online Teaching Collapse

📧 Unresponsive Communication

📚 Effort-for-Grade Reality

⚖️ Polarized Reputation

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

💬 About Communication and Support

See exactly what the AI read.

Quality ratings

Course coverage

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

A range

B range

C range

D range

F

No letter grade reported

Avoid her online psych sections if you need teaching support; only risk in person if and .