AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Kimberly Christensen

MATH70 · MATH122 · MATH90 · 12 lifetime ratings

AI rating
18/100
RMP rating
2.0/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
4.1

The decision

Avoid unless no other MATH section is open; plan to teach yourself and expect a tough, unsupportive experience.

Best fit · Self Taught ProConfusing lecturesTough graderSelf-teach heavyRude vibeAvoid if possible
  • , and little helpful one-on-one support.
  • and many report dropping or failing MATH90 under her.
  • A small minority liked clear lectures, but the .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

24/100

and , and several students dropped even after trying hard.

; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

22/100

and self-study demands rather than clear scaffolding.

; no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

, so flexibility cannot be confirmed.

; no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

16/100

Nearly every detailed and .

; no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

22/100

Students repeatedly call her a and little partial-credit support.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Self-teaching plus hard homework-aligned tests creates a heavy effective .

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Poor

24/100

Dominant , and rude unhelpful responses to questions.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

78/100

Tests appear central and are described as the hardest book problems, with .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

12 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person and hybrid MATH and high-stress, with students left to self-teach and .

Main concern

, and tests built from the hardest book problems.

What students said

“ ! unless you are prepared to fail.”
MATH90
“She makes the of the book. She is not helpful when asking questions”
MATH90
“The instructor basically left the student to teach themselves the material.”
MATH90

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are described as stacked with the hardest section problems and poorly supported by in-class teaching.

Hardest Book ProblemsPoor Test PrepConfusing Lectures

Assessment risk

Strict

28/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person MATH tests are called very hard, with weak prep and .

Hardest Book ProblemsWeak PrepSelf-Teach Required
“She makes the of the book.”
MATH90
“ way to solve the problem, not even show you in class!”
MATH90
“ , no surprises.”
MATH90

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ ! unless you are prepared to fail.”

Voice snapshots generated from 12 in-person MATH reviews with strong negative consensus and a few outliers. Credibility rating: Medium.

🚫

16/100

“will not recommand her unless all the other classes are full.”

❓

24/100

“Instructor Christensen obviously does not understand the material. .”

📉

28/100

“She makes the of the book. She is not helpful when asking questions”

📚

28/100

“The instructor basically left the student to teach themselves the material.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Rudest teacher I've ever had.
  • Problems worked out on board were wrong on occasion
  • she over complicated everything she taught.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • unless you are prepared to fail.
  • .
  • once i took the class with a different teacher i passed with an A.

Theme 3

⚠️ About Support

  • She tells you that you need to figure it out outside of class.
  • .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

12

Recent reviews read by the AI

12

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

Twelve mostly recent MATH reviews are highly consistent in negativity, though sample size is modest and a few positive outliers exist.

Inside 12 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 52
3 out of 51
2 out of 56
1 out of 53

Course coverage

MATH909 reviews
MATH1222 reviews
MATH701 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

1

A+ 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

3

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Not_Sure_Yet 2