AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

S Reynolds

MMATH7625 · MMATH3885 · MATH90 · MATH20 · MATH70 · 11 lifetime ratings

AI rating
36/100
RMP rating
2.9/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.6

The decision

Avoid unless you are already strong in math and and .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerStrict GraderFast PacedMandatory AttendanceShow All WorkPolarizing New Teacher
  • Many call her strict, fast, and .
  • and little makeup flexibility.
  • A if you ask and stay engaged.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

34/100

Strict half-credit , and fast coverage make high grades costly.

; no online reviews were analyzed.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

32/100

Students report covering multiple sections a day with complex solution methods and little reteaching.

; no online reviews were analyzed.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

and no makeups if you miss a day.

; no online reviews were analyzed.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

35/100

More students warn others off for and pace than praise her as a must-take.

; no online reviews were analyzed.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

26/100

and wrong steps can wipe half the .

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

38/100

Fast and expensive unused books add friction.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Average

44/100

and helpful when asked; and she moves on anyway.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Pop quizzes, exams, and and in-class checks feeling decisive.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

11 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person math is often described as strict and fast with ; and helpful if you ask.

Main concern

Harsh partial credit, pace, and .

What students said

“she is to strict in the problems we do you have to write step by step and if you get something wrong she takes half the points”
MATH20
“ section if you miss a day and there are no make-ups for quizes”
MMATH3885
“I love Stacey... Going through the material in and easy to understand!”
MATH90

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams and and reports of new material appearing on tests.

Pop QuizzesNo MakeupsNew Material On ExamsShow All Work

Assessment risk

Strict

32/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and and reports of new exam content.

Pop QuizzesNo MakeupsNew Material On ExamsShow All Work
“She'll put new material on the exams.”
MATH20
“there are no make-ups for quizes and probably exams.”
MMATH3885

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ .”

Voice snapshots generated from 11 , and a supportive minority. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

44/100

“When she talks about math, it's like talking in another language. None if it makes sense”

👎 Recommendation Rate

35/100

“ ”

⚖️

26/100

“if you get something wrong she takes half the ”

📅

18/100

“ section if you miss a day”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • .. if you ask her too.
  • She tends to solve problems in the more complex way
  • She teaches according to her schedule and moves on even if the class does not understand

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • My whole class failed two exams and she blamed us.
  • you have to write step by step and if you get something wrong she takes half the points
  • but an easy A)

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • I love Stacey. She is a new teacher but
  • she's impatient and annoying at times.
  • She treats student like they are children.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

11

Recent reviews read by the AI

11

Lifetime ratings

52/100

Evidence confidence

Eleven mixed reviews from around 2009-2010 with but small sample and no grade distribution.

Inside 11 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 52
3 out of 50
2 out of 55
1 out of 51

Course coverage

MATH205 reviews
MATH702 reviews
MATH902 reviews
MMATH38851 review
MMATH76251 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values