AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Karl Retiz

MATH10 · MATH90 · 8 lifetime ratings

AI rating
16/100
RMP rating
1.7/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
4.4

The decision

Do not take him if of passing.

Best fit · Self Taught ProConfusing LecturesTests Uncovered MaterialRuthless GraderSkip StepsDo Not Take
  • Nearly every review warns that and examples are often done wrong.
  • Tests regularly include material not covered in class, with .
  • One outlier liked a lower-level review course, but the .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

12/100

Students say it is nearly impossible to pass, with and .

.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

22/100

Difficulty comes less from pure content level and more from confusing delivery that .

.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews do not clearly state an , so flexibility cannot be confirmed.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

14/100

Almost all students explicitly .

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

15/100

Multiple students call grading ruthless and say failing the midterm under 60 can get you dropped.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

42/100

The main burden is relearning everything yourself after .

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Awful

18/100

Students report wrong examples, skipped steps, constant confusion, and little helpful support.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

78/100

High-stakes tests dominate outcomes, including random hard items and .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

8 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person math where students say lectures confuse more than the book, and .

Main concern

, and tests on untaught material.

What students said

“ if you want to pass.”
MATH90
“half of the problems he does in class he does wrong. .”
MATH90
“ . Pick another instructor if you want to pass Math 90.”
MATH90

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are described as strict and mismatched to class coverage, with harsh scoring and .

Uncovered Test QuestionsRuthless GradingMidterm Drop ThresholdIn-Class Material Mismatch

Assessment risk

Strict

22/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person tests include hard random questions never covered, and cutoff.

Uncovered Test QuestionsRuthless GradingMidterm Drop Threshold
“he puts hard, random questions on the !”
MATH90
“if you don't pass the midterm with a 60 you get dropped!”
MATH10
“ .”
MATH90

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“DO NOT UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCES TAKE THIS TEACHERS CLASS FOR ANY MATH!! He is by far the !”

Voice snapshots generated from 8 in-person reviews with strong negative consensus on clarity and testing. Credibility rating: Medium.

🚫 Teaching Disaster

18/100

“ . You can read the book and understand the lesson but by the time he is done lecturing you will have no idea how to do the problems.”

📝 Unfair Tests

22/100

“ notes.”

⛔

14/100

“LISTEN TO YOUR PEERS!! !!!”

📉 Pass Risk

12/100

“horrible math Teacher! if you want to pass Math. Its impossible to pass!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • always did his examples wrong
  • he does most of the problems in his head so he skips steps
  • .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty And Grades

  • .
  • if you don't pass the midterm with a 60 you get dropped!

Theme 3

⚠️ Peer Warnings

  • if you want to pass.
  • DO NOT UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCES TAKE THIS TEACHERS CLASS FOR ANY MATH!!
  • Pick another instructor if you want to pass Math 90.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

8

Recent reviews read by the AI

8

Lifetime ratings

55/100

Evidence confidence

Eight consistently negative in-person reviews from 2010-2012 are highly aligned, though the sample is small and dated.

Inside 8 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 51
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 55

Course coverage

MATH906 reviews
MATH102 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values